The predictive modeling of student achievement in national education systems faces a persistent conflict between the need for large-scale data utility and the stringent requirements of student data privacy. This study addresses this challenge through a high-performance personalized federated learning framework that predicts the General Success Score Percentiles of 1,094,954 students in a national high school entrance examination under a simulated regional federation in which model updates rather than raw regional records were exchanged during federated training. Utilizing a large dataset of 31 diverse predictors encompassing academic history, instructional quality, and socio-economic factors, the research compared three neural architectures consisting of a Multilayer Perceptron, a Federated Attention Model, and a Deep and Cross Network. To manage the inherent regional heterogeneity and non-independent and non-identically distributed data across the seven geographical regions, the study utilized the FedProx optimization algorithm. Results showed that the Personalized Federated Multilayer Perceptron achieved the highest overall predictive performance (
$${R}^{2}=0.7972$$
), modestly exceeding the centralized XGBoost (
$${R}^{2}=0.7947$$
) and centralized MLP (
$${R}^{2}=0.7910$$
) baselines while retaining the decentralized and region-adaptive advantages of federated learning without pooling raw regional records. The integration of Regional SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis provided a transparent mapping of feature importance, revealing that while prior academic performance is the primary national driver, environmental factors exert disproportionate influence in specific metropolitan and other regions. The findings indicate that regionally adaptive models can support targeted resource allocation, while cautioning that systems predicting attainment from environmental context risk formalising the disadvantage they measure.
Aytac Gokce, Mutlu Cukurova, Ramazan Esmeli· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into educational practice, promising to enhance teaching and learning. Yet delegating pedagogical tasks to AI raises concerns about teacher deskilling, erosion of professional judgement, and diminished agency. Drawing on the teacher-AI teaming taxonomy, we conducted a systematic review of 103 studies of teacher-facing AI tools across educational contexts to analyse system capabilities, patterns of interactions and influences on teaching practice. Our analysis reveals that advanced technical capabilities of contemporary AI models were utilised at lower transactional teaming levels for automating narrow instructional functions. Situational and operational teaming, which supports teacher awareness and teacher-directed goal execution, are also common in Generative AI in education literature and have demonstrated complementary benefits. However, available evidence relies on student-focused measures, whereas the augmented impacts, particularly on teaching effectiveness, remain underexplored. In contrast, higher forms of teaming as praxical and synergistic teaming, which afford co-adaptation and structured co-reasoning, promoting reflective professional practice, remain rare. These findings suggest that current teacher-facing AI systems have yet to fully leverage AI to strengthen teacher agency. We conclude the paper with recommendations on how to realise such forms of teaming, which require advances not only in model capability but also in interaction design that support transparent reasoning, teacher-controllable interfaces, and sustained teacher participation in system development.
Mutlu Cukurova, Wannapon Suraworachet, Qi Zhou et al.· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.