Glioblastoma’s pronounced migratory capacity underlies its diffuse invasion, presenting a formidable barrier to successful treatment. Ex vivo characterization of glioblastoma cells isolated from freshly resected clinical samples under physiologically relevant conditions revealed two distinct migratory phenotypes, Fast-Migrating (FM) and Slow-Migrating (SM). These phenotypes reflect distinct mechanosensitivity profiles and are associated with pharmacological responses that support the motor–clutch model of cell migration. Analysis of genes associated with these phenotypes revealed a transcriptomic signature that closely associated with in vitro cell migration, histological invasion in patient specimens, and clinical survival. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing revealed that FM and SM cells coexist within a single glioblastoma, with FM cells enriched at the periphery and SM cells localized to the tumor core. Collectively, our study demonstrates the utility of ex vivo glioblastoma characterization, allowing decoding of tumor heterogeneity and clinical prognostication as well as providing a framework for deconvoluting the complex cancer phenotype.
Jay Hou, M. McMahon, Andrew Ni et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a deadly cancer driven in part by invasion of tumor cells into the brain. Transcriptomic analyses have identified distinct molecular subtypes, but mechanistic differences that account for clinical differences are not clear. In this study, we show that, as predicted by the motor-clutch model of cell migration, mesenchymal glioma cells are more spread, generate larger traction forces, and migrate faster in brain tissue compared with proneural cells. Despite their rapid migration and comparable proliferation rates in vitro, mice with mesenchymal tumors survive longer than those with proneural tumors. This improved survival correlated with an immune response in mesenchymal tumors, including T cell–mediated. Consistently, inducing mesenchymal tumors in immunodeficient mice resulted in shorter survival, supporting a protective immune role in mesenchymal tumors. Thus, mesenchymal tumors have aggressive migration but are immunologically “hot,” which suppresses net proliferation. These two features counteract each other and may explain the lack of a strong survival difference between subtypes clinically, while also opening up new opportunities for subtype-specific therapies. Significance: This study highlights new mechanical and immunologic insights into GBM molecular subtypes using an integrated modeling–genome engineering strategy, which can potentially facilitate GBM subtype-specific therapeutic strategies.
Ghaidan A Shamsan, Chao J. Liu, B. Braman et al.· Cancer Research Communicatio...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
