Abstract Co‐occurrence of child and adolescent neurodevelopmental and mental health conditions is the rule rather than the exception, yet translating this insight into shared frameworks and clinical practice remains challenging. In this Editorial, we are pleased to introduce the 26 papers included in the 2026 Special Issue of JCPP Advances. This Special Issue aimed to advance our understanding of transdiagnostic mechanisms, dimensions, and practices in child and adolescent mental health, and includes original articles, reviews, commentaries, and an editorial perspective. Collectively, these articles illustrate three main ‘transdiagnostic’ conceptualisations; (i) mechanistic approaches identifying shared biological, cognitive, or affective processes across diagnostic boundaries; (ii) dimensional approaches mapping symptom covariance onto hierarchical structures such as the general ‘p’ factor and internalising, externalising, and neurodevelopmental spectra; and (iii) developmental, clinical‐staging approaches treating early, non‐specific features as precursors to a broad range of later outcomes. Methodologically, the current Special Issue highlights both the opportunities and limitations of large existing datasets, multi‐informant assessment, and neuroimaging and genomic approaches, while underscoring the persistent difficulty of modelling transdiagnostic dimensions developmentally. Importantly, while translation into routine clinical care remains limited, the field is now well positioned to test the clinical utility and effectiveness of transdiagnostic dimensional assessments and interventions in routine care.
A. Bellato, Stephen P. Becker, C. Hartman et al.· JCPP Advances· 0 citations
Abstract Background Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications can reduce ADHD symptom severity in individuals with comorbid autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, clinical guidance on pharmacological treatment of ADHD in this clinical population remains limited and inconsistent. Characterising real-world treatment patterns (ie, initiation timing, medication choices, switching, discontinuation) and the impact of alternative medication choices on clinical outcomes is critical for informing evidence-based management strategies. Objective To (1) characterise ADHD pharmacological treatment patterns in youth with ADHD+ASD versus ADHD alone and (2) assess whether using alternative ADHD medications versus methylphenidate is associated with differential changes in negative clinical outcomes among youth with ADHD+ASD. Methods This is a population-based cohort study using Swedish national registers. The study included children (<13 years) and adolescents (13–17 years) with an incident ADHD diagnosis between 2007 and 2018 and followed-up until 2021, comparing youth with co-occurring ASD (n=24 117) and ADHD alone (n=79 830). Descriptive outcomes included time to pharmacological treatment initiation, medication type, number of medication switches and discontinuations. The primary outcome was changes in rates of inpatient psychiatric hospitalisations, accidental injuries and specialist care visits for substance use, depressive or anxiety disorders in the 1 year after versus the 1 year before medication initiation. Findings Individuals with ADHD+ASD experienced longer delays to treatment initiation (12–14% initiated >12 months after diagnosis vs 7–8% in ADHD alone). Children with ADHD+ASD were slightly more likely to discontinue treatment within 3 months (16% vs 12%) and had the highest average number of medication switches within 3 years (2.6; IQR 0.0–2.0). In within-individual analyses, comparisons of alternative ADHD medications versus methylphenidate did not yield statistically significant differences after correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Children with ADHD+ASD experienced longer delays to treatment initiation and more frequent medication switching compared with those with ADHD only. The effects of alternative ADHD medication options on key negative clinical outcomes appeared similar to those of methylphenidate. Clinical implications These findings suggest that, rather than recommending fixed first-line and second-line treatments for individuals with ADHD-ASD, clinical guidelines should emphasise appropriate training as well as prompt and individualised treatment based on a shared decision-making process.
M. Garcia-Argibay, R. Kuja-Halkola, B. D'Onofrio et al.· BMJ mental health· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
