Skip to content

Author

Appalabathula Venkatesh

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

#reinforcement learning Review Open access Sep 2026

Next-generation electrified powertrain technologies for sustainable mobility: A systematic review of architectures, intelligent control, energy storage, and grid integration

The global imperative to decarbonise road transport has required the automotive and energy sectors to reconceptualise vehicular powertrain engineering across all scales, from atomic-level electrochemistry to fleet-level grid interaction. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review synthesises 120 peer-reviewed publications, standards, and archival documents identified from a four-database search covering January 2018 to June 2026 (1204 records identified; 847 screened; 120 included). Four interconnected technology frontiers are examined in depth: (i) advanced vehicle architectures spanning Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs), and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs), including distributed propulsion with active torque vectoring, in-wheel motors, and grid-connected renewable-source integration; (ii) next-generation electrochemical energy storage covering solid-state, sodium-ion, and lithium–sulfur batteries alongside hybrid supercapacitor architectures, with critical appraisal of conflicting experimental findings on dendrite formation, sodium storage mechanisms, and commercialisation timelines; (iii) intelligent Energy Management Systems (EMS) spanning rule-based control, Equivalent Consumption Minimisation Strategy (ECMS), Model Predictive Control (MPC), the full spectrum of Sliding Mode Control (SMC) variants including super-twisting second-order SMC with adaptive gain laws, Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs); and (iv) grid-interactive infrastructure encompassing Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) systems, wireless power transfer under SAE J2954, and cloud–edge digital twin frameworks with federated learning and cybersecurity provisions. Wide-bandgap SiC and GaN power electronics and six thermal management strategies are analysed as cross-cutting enablers. All quantitative comparison figures in this review (Figs. 13–27) are illustrative reconstructions digitised from data reported in the cited primary literature; they are not independently simulated results, and no new experimental or simulation data are reported in this work. A bibliometric analysis of the 120 included studies reveals growth from 8 papers (2018) to 35 papers (2025). A four-criterion quality assessment framework grades each reviewed technology. A structured technology readiness roadmap with 2030 quantitative projections derived from learning-rate battery cost models and IEA fleet scenarios projects battery costs of $55–70/kWh, SiC penetration of 80–95% in premium BEV inverters, and V2G participation of 8–20% of the EU passenger fleet. These are scenario projections carrying explicitly stated model assumptions and uncertainty ranges, not forecasts; the accompanying sensitivity analysis ( Section 12.1 ) identifies the learning rate and the cumulative-deployment trajectory as the dominant drivers, and a demonstrated-versus-projected classification is applied throughout to separate laboratory or pilot evidence from extrapolation.

Appalabathula Venkatesh, Subrahmanyam Tanala · 0 citations
#federated learning Open access Sep 2026

AI for EV battery health: Statistical meta-analysis and Autonomous Intelligence Pyramid

The transportation sector accounts for approximately 21% of global CO 2 emissions ( ≈ 8.4 Gt CO 2 in 2024), and the electrification of road transport is a critical lever for decarbonisation. Annual global EV battery deployment reached 1.2 TWh in 2025, making accurate battery health monitoring essential for both performance and sustainability. This review, conducted via a PRISMA-based protocol over 531 peer-reviewed studies (2018–2026), provides a statistical meta-analysis of all major AI families deployed in battery management: classical machine learning, ensemble methods, deep sequential networks, hybrid CNN architectures, Transformers, Physics-Informed ML (PIML), Explainable AI (XAI), Federated Learning, and Large Battery Foundation Models. A DerSimonian–Laird random-effects meta-analysis with 95% confidence intervals and I 2 heterogeneity statistics confirms that CNN–LSTM achieves a pooled RMSE of 0.47% (95% CI: 0.41%–0.53%, d = 3.42 vs EKF baseline) and Transformer architectures reach 0.42% (0.36%–0.48%, d = 3.78 ). The Foundation Model group, based on only nine studies at TRL 2–3, yields a preliminary pooled RMSE of 0.42% that is sensitivity-dependent on a single influential study; this figure should not be directly compared with the more robustly supported Transformer estimate. Critical limitations of all emerging methods are explicitly characterised. Environmental and social impacts of battery energy systems, including CO 2 lifecycle analysis, are discussed. An author-proposed five-layer Autonomous Battery Intelligence Pyramid is presented as a speculative research roadmap, with a dedicated implementation pathway discussion, clearly distinguished throughout from experimentally validated findings.

Subrahmanyam Tanala, Appalabathula Venkatesh · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.