Skip to content

FinSAgent: Corpus-Aligned Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Evidence-Grounded SEC Filing Question Answering

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.18102 · 0 citations · 49 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

FinSAgent is proposed, an evidence-grounded multi-agent framework that reframes SEC filing QA as corpus-aligned retrieval planning and corrects both ends with a single principle: inject corpus-side conditioning wherever model priors would otherwise dominate.

Abstract

Financial question answering over U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings requires retrieving and synthesizing heterogeneous evidence dispersed across long, standardized, and highly redundant disclosures. Existing retrieval-augmented and multi-agent systems typically derive retrieval queries directly from the user's question and rank candidates by semantic similarity. Together, these choices create prior-corpus misalignment: a mismatch between model priors and the target filings'structure, terminology, and evidence standards. As a result, query generation misses corpus-specific evidence, while semantic reranking favors topically similar but evidentially invalid false-positive chunks. We propose FinSAgent, an evidence-grounded multi-agent framework that reframes SEC filing QA as corpus-aligned retrieval planning and corrects both ends with a single principle: inject corpus-side conditioning wherever model priors would otherwise dominate. FinSAgent combines (1) role-specialized agents anchored to the mandated 10-K item structure, (2) database-aware query decomposition that conditions each agent's sub-queries on a lightweight, summary-level view of the local corpus, and (3) multi-path retrieval with a learned feature-gated reranker that separates evidential validity from semantic similarity. Across five offline financial QA benchmarks, FinSAgent improves retrieval coverage and answer correctness over strong single-agent and multi-agent baselines; in a three-arm randomized online experiment with 1,000 anonymous user ratings, it also receives higher scores than baselines.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

FinInteract: Benchmarking Clarification and Intent Integration in Ambiguous Financial Question Answering

FinInteract, a bilingual (English/Chinese) benchmark of 173 instances that pairs each question with a default and an intended interpretation across a five-category ambiguity taxonomy, and grades whether an agent elicits the right clarification and then integrates it, finds that conditioning on the ambiguity category im...

Xin-Yu Wang, Tung Sum Thomas Kwok, Zhenghan Tai et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

MABPD: Multi-Agent Bias Probing&Detection via Structured Argument Debate

Media bias in news articles operates through subtle linguistic cues---loaded language, selective framing, and strategic omission---that resist single-model detection and have traditionally required large annotated corpora for supervised training. We ask whether structured multi-agent deliberation can serve as a princip...

Garvit Joshi, Stavya Dhyani, Jasmine et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

GroundedGEO: Auditing the Evidence Gap in Generative Search Rankings

Generative search systems rank products and services for consequential decisions, and publishers can cheaply make candidate text look relevant. Yet evidence status is not a text property but a claim-evidence relation: text-only rankers and defenses cannot separate honest detailed content from fabricated detail, creatin...

Yi-Han Xia, Hui-Ling Fan, Kang-Rong Zhong et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond Confidence: Test-Time Scaling for Multi-Turn Search Agents via Retrieval Grounding

Retrieval-Grounded Voting (RGV), which scores each rollout by the lexical overlap between its final answer and the documents it retrieved, consistently outperforms confidence-based voting and identifies the underlying failure reason as copy inflation.

Hyunho Kook, Junhyuk So, Tianyu Fu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ClueWeaver: Reward-Guided Dual-Agent Evidence Reasoning for Compact LLMs on Literary Long Narratives

Experiments across multiple long-context narrative question answering and claim verification settings show that ClueWeaver substantially improves local end-to-end language models while providing evidence coverage and paragraph-referenced reasoning traces.

Ji-Hao Zhu, Zhi-Wei Yang, Wen-Xiao Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

SPAR-Hate: Auditor-Guided Multi-Perspective Role Reasoning for Bilingual Hate Speech Parsing

SPAR-Hate is an auditor-guided multi-perspective role-reasoning framework for bilingual hate speech parsing that decomposes each document into local focus units, elicits evidence-grounded candidates from Victim, Moderator, and Cultural Bystander perspectives, resolves candidate conflicts under grounding and schema cons...

Yifan Lyu, Dianqing Lin, Xinran Li et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.