IB-Forecast is proposed, an inherently interpretable multivariate time-series forecasting framework that decomposes forecasting into a learned periodic component and a residual component computed with explainable masks over input tokens that guarantees high explanation fidelity.
Abstract
As forecasts increasingly drive decisions in fields such as energy, transportation, and healthcare, understanding the historical data behind these predictions has become as crucial as the predictions themselves. Although existing interpretable-by-design forecasters reveal their internal structures, they offer no guarantee that these structures faithfully reflect the underlying evidence driving the predictions. In contrast, while faithfulness-oriented methods explicitly verify model behavior, they are almost exclusively designed for post-hoc classification tasks. To bridge this gap, we propose IB-Forecast, an inherently interpretable multivariate time-series forecasting framework. It decomposes forecasting into a learned periodic component and a residual component computed with explainable masks over input tokens. With a budget-constrained information bottleneck, end-to-end optimization enables users to directly control explanation sparsity. With a rigorous faithfulness evaluation protocol, extensive experiments demonstrate that IB-Forecast matches the forecasting error of leading black-box models while providing faithful explanations at no additional inference cost. Furthermore, under a matched sparsity budget, these native explanations consistently surpass gradient-based, occlusion-based, and optimization-based baselines across all evaluated datasets. Ultimately, whereas the native explanations of existing interpretable forecasters exhibit poor faithfulness, IB-Forecast guarantees high explanation fidelity, requiring only 14-20% of the observations to deliver low-error predictions.
A unified objective function for explainable time series learning that bridges attribution and counterfactual reasoning within a single framework is proposed and a novel explanation framework is introduced that learns a parametric transformation network to construct explanation-embedded instances.
Xu Zheng, Zichuan Liu, Zhuo-Min Chen et al.· 0 citations
A model-agnostic explainability framework that explains forecasting predictions by attributing each forecast horizon to temporally relevant historical lags is proposed, and results show that the semantic-flow variant achieves competitive or superior faithfulness compared to standard post-hoc baselines, while being subs...
ConceptTS is introduced, an interpretable forecasting framework that organizes its predictions around named, human-readable concepts that achieves accuracy competitive with strong black-box baselines while producing semantically meaningful concept activations.
The main finding is that a frozen parent's recursive trajectory is easier to fit than the observed future with lightweight parallel exits, and a correctable residual projection along a train-selected periodic history direction is found.
Ziang Li, Yue Huang, Guo-Xu Zhou et al.· 0 citations
REATS is proposed, which leverages LLM reasoning capabilities as an intelligent ensemble router that jointly processes textual temporal pattern descriptions and numerical features to produce interpretable, sample-adaptive ensemble weights through chain-of-thought reasoning.
Mechanistic interpretability aims to reverse-engineer Large Language Models (LLMs) into human-understandable components, assuming that these components can predict and control model behavior. We challenge this assumption by demonstrating that autoregressive generation exhibits chaotic dynamics and Rashomon multiplicity...
Renju Rajeev, Raghavendra Kamat, Mohankrishna Kothapalli et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.