The results identify modality-order sensitivity as a circuit-level failure in VLMs and demonstrate that simple, asymmetric test-time adaptation can effectively mitigate it and even improve performance over the baseline.
Abstract
We find that vision-language models are sensitive to a specific semantically irrelevant change: the order in which the image and question are presented. Across three models and three benchmarks, image first prompting consistently outperforms question-first prompting, revealing a repeatable modality order failure. We use this gap to design an order-consistent test-time training method. Our method substantially closes the modality-order gap across all evaluated settings. Surprisingly, it also yields consistent improvements in the stronger image-first branch over the baseline, hence bootstrapping both orderings toward mutual consistency. Activation patching localizes the ordering failure to a narrow mid-network region where representations diverge sharply between prompt orders. We find that the test-time training method repairs this misalignment across layers. Together, our results identify modality-order sensitivity as a circuit-level failure in VLMs and demonstrate that simple, asymmetric test-time adaptation can effectively mitigate it and even improve performance over the baseline.
It is indicated that current VLMs can identify anomalies within individual frames but struggle to integrate information across frames to reason about temporal consistency, and TimeCatch provides a controlled benchmark for evaluating temporal grounding in vision-language models.
This work systematically characterize the implicit biases introduced by low-rank adaptation during alignment and establishes two theorems showing that low-rank alignment induces preferences for parameter subspaces with flat gradients and feature subspaces robust to perturbations, providing a principled explanation for...
Mingjia Shi, Shuo Wang, Xiaobo Wang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Modality reliance in VLMs is not fixed, but varies across tasks, evidence structures, models, and evaluation settings, which shows that modality reliance in VLMs is not fixed, but varies across tasks, evidence structures, and evaluation settings.
For the coarse attributes the authors study, MLLMs encode the visual evidence but cannot reliably control their reliance on it, indicating that for the coarse attributes they study, MLLMs cannot reliably control their reliance on it.
Jiaang Li, Chengzu Li, Zhaochong An et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
PuRF is introduced, a novel PuRiFication-driven cache-based method for multi-label test-time adaptation of vision-language models that consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods on ViT-B/32 across five datasets.
Yiwen Liang, Hui Chen, Yizhe Xiong et al.· 0 citations
A Low-Complexity Cross-Modal Alignment via Projection (LCAP) network is proposed, which introduces Projective Token Compression (PTC), which leverages Mish activation and adaptive average pooling to reduce feature redundancy while enhancing discriminative information, and Positional Spatial Enhancement (PSE), which exp...
Yu-Chen Sha, Lingli Wan, Ge Yang et al.· The Visual Computer· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.