Aug 2026· Biotechnology Advances· pp.
109018
· 0 citations· 203 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review focuses on the action mode of different base editors, highlights their interplays with the TLS, summarizes their potential therapeutic applications and discusses perspective strategies to improve precision and expand targeting scope.
Abstract
Base editors (BEs) are transformative genome engineering tools that enable precise nucleotide substitutions without inducing double-strand breaks (DSBs) or requiring donor DNA templates. Since the first cytosine base editor (CBE) was developed in 2016, the field has advanced rapidly, with the creation of diverse BE variants that incorporate distinct deaminases and glycosylases. These engineered editors have significantly expanded the scope of genome editing by generating deaminated bases or apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site lesions, thereby harnessing endogenous DNA repair or replication mechanisms to produce base transitions and transversions. Among these endogenous pathways, trans-lesion synthesis (TLS) plays a particularly critical role in converting AP sites into specific base substitutions. TLS polymerases insert nucleotides opposite AP lesions, and the final editing outcome is dictated by the unique nucleotide preferences of individual TLS polymerases. This review focuses on the action mode of different base editors, highlights their interplays with the TLS, summarizes their potential therapeutic applications and discusses perspective strategies to improve precision and expand targeting scope.
This review compares Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) with generations of cytosine base editors (CBE1–CBE3), adenine base editors (ABE1-ABE7), and prime editors (PE1–PE3b), focusing on their mechanistic distinctions, efficiencies, delivery challenges, and therapeutic applications.
Anoushka Sinha· American Journal of Student...· 0 citations
Key remaining challenges include bystander editing within the activity window, residual off-target DNA and RNA editing, delivery constraints, delivery constraints, immunogenicity, and the need for durable long-term safety evidence across relevant cell types and disease contexts.
Moksada Regmi, K. Ma, Changhao Bi et al.· Cell Genomics· 0 citations
The effectiveness of the SaCas9 modular base editors, the robustness of the platform’s modularity, and its feasibility for convenient screening of target-specific base editors are demonstrated.
J. Collantes, Kellen Xu, Melany Ruiz-Urigüen et al.· The CRISPR Journal· 0 citations
A single-nucleotide resolution ABE created by fusing a nickase Cas9, nCas9-H840A, with the deaminase domain of ADAR, which acts on DNA:RNA hybrids, instead of TadA, which acts on single-stranded DNA in conventional ABEs.
Hyeon Woo Im, Bada Jeong, Yeji Lee et al.· Nature Biotechnology· 1 citation
Base editors hold great promise in endogenous mutagenesis for genetic screening. However, the development of base editors that induce saturated multi-base conversions with diverse mutation spectrum is challenging. Here, we develop triple base editors (smACGs) that simultaneously mutagenize adenine, cytosine, and guanin...
The results demonstrate that structure-guided refinement of AI-designed deaminases can produce precise, versatile base editors for nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, expanding the research and therapeutic applications of genome editing toolkits.