Skip to content
Review

Recent advances in base editing technology and its applications in disease therapy.

Aug 2026 · Biotechnology Advances · pp. 109018 · 0 citations · 203 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This review focuses on the action mode of different base editors, highlights their interplays with the TLS, summarizes their potential therapeutic applications and discusses perspective strategies to improve precision and expand targeting scope.

Abstract

Base editors (BEs) are transformative genome engineering tools that enable precise nucleotide substitutions without inducing double-strand breaks (DSBs) or requiring donor DNA templates. Since the first cytosine base editor (CBE) was developed in 2016, the field has advanced rapidly, with the creation of diverse BE variants that incorporate distinct deaminases and glycosylases. These engineered editors have significantly expanded the scope of genome editing by generating deaminated bases or apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site lesions, thereby harnessing endogenous DNA repair or replication mechanisms to produce base transitions and transversions. Among these endogenous pathways, trans-lesion synthesis (TLS) plays a particularly critical role in converting AP sites into specific base substitutions. TLS polymerases insert nucleotides opposite AP lesions, and the final editing outcome is dictated by the unique nucleotide preferences of individual TLS polymerases. This review focuses on the action mode of different base editors, highlights their interplays with the TLS, summarizes their potential therapeutic applications and discusses perspective strategies to improve precision and expand targeting scope.

View source

Similar papers

Review 2026

From Double-Strand Breaks to Precision Edits: A Comparative Review of Modern Genome Editing Tools

This review compares Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) with generations of cytosine base editors (CBE1–CBE3), adenine base editors (ABE1-ABE7), and prime editors (PE1–PE3b), focusing on their mechanistic distinctions, efficiencies, delivery challenges, and therapeutic applications.

Anoushka Sinha · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Base editing for precision therapeutics.

Key remaining challenges include bystander editing within the activity window, residual off-target DNA and RNA editing, delivery constraints, delivery constraints, immunogenicity, and the need for durable long-term safety evidence across relevant cell types and disease contexts.

Moksada Regmi, K. Ma, Changhao Bi et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Development and Characterization of RNA Aptamer-Mediated Modular Base Editors Containing Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 Derivatives and Novel Deaminase Orthologs

The effectiveness of the SaCas9 modular base editors, the robustness of the platform’s modularity, and its feasibility for convenient screening of target-specific base editors are demonstrated.

J. Collantes, Kellen Xu, Melany Ruiz-Urigüen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Engineered ADARs enable precision A-to-G base editing of DNA.

A single-nucleotide resolution ABE created by fusing a nickase Cas9, nCas9-H840A, with the deaminase domain of ADAR, which acts on DNA:RNA hybrids, instead of TadA, which acts on single-stranded DNA in conventional ABEs.

Hyeon Woo Im, Bada Jeong, Yeji Lee et al. · 1 citation
Open access Jul 2026

High-diversity base mutagenesis via simultaneous adenine, cytosine and guanine editing

Base editors hold great promise in endogenous mutagenesis for genetic screening. However, the development of base editors that induce saturated multi-base conversions with diverse mutation spectrum is challenging. Here, we develop triple base editors (smACGs) that simultaneously mutagenize adenine, cytosine, and guanin...

Meng-Jia Hong, Changming Luan, Meng Yuan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Structure-guided engineering of AI-derived adenine base editors for nuclear and mitochondrial DNA editing

The results demonstrate that structure-guided refinement of AI-designed deaminases can produce precise, versatile base editors for nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, expanding the research and therapeutic applications of genome editing toolkits.

Hye-Yeon Hwang, Nabukenya Mariam, Jiyeon Kweon et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.