Skip to content
Book Open access

Trustworthy LLM-Based Agents for Data-Centric AI

Aug 2026 · Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 · pp. 13299-13303 · 0 citations · 48 references

TL;DR

This tutorial delivers a systematic, data-centric roadmap to build LLM agents that are not merely capable but provably trustworthy, unifying advances in LLM agents, robust machine learning, and data-centric AI.

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) based agents are evolving from conversational chatbots into autonomous decision-makers that plan, reason, wield tools, and collaborate across high-stakes domains such as healthcare, finance, and scientific discovery. Yet this power brings a fundamental challenge: trustworthiness. How can we guarantee that an agent remains robust when real-world data shifts, degrades, or is deliberately poisoned? What defenses exist against memory injection, tool-based exploits, or cascade failures in multi-agent systems? Can we embed domain-specific causal validity, clinical safety, or fairness directly into agent reasoning? And how do we measure trust when it spans robustness, security, reliability, and alignment — each with its own irreconcilable trade-offs? This tutorial delivers a systematic, data-centric roadmap to build LLM agents that are not merely capable but provably trustworthy. We organize the landscape into four interconnected pillars: (i) generalizability under distribution shift, noise, and adversarial inputs; (ii) security architectures that defend against emerging threats — from indirect prompt injection to supply-chain vulnerabilities; (iii) domain-grounded trust in science, engineering, medicine, and commerce, where agents must respect theories, systems, clinical causality, and fairness constraints; and (iv) multi-dimensional evaluation benchmarks that expose trade-offs rather than collapsing them into a single score. By unifying advances in LLM agents, robust machine learning, and data-centric AI, we equip the audience with both foundational principles and actionable recipes to design, deploy, and ultimately trust the next generation of autonomous agent systems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

EBRB–LLM Hybrid Architectures for Trustworthy Agentic AI: Vision, Opportunities, and Challenges

This position paper argues that EBRB could serve as a core safety and reasoning governor within LLM-based agentic pipelines, yielding hybrid systems to better align agentic AI systems with emerging regulatory and ethical requirements for Trustworthy AI (TAI) in high-risk settings.

Jun Liu, Chris D. Nugent, De-Hu Yu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

Trustworthy Agentic AI: Failure Modes, Mitigation Strategies, and a Lifecycle Framework for Autonomous LLM Systems

Agentic AI systems built on large language models can plan over multiple steps, use external tools, retain information in memory, and coordinate with other agents. These capabilities make them more useful than static language models, but they also introduce new security and operational risks. Untrusted content from web...

Fayeq Jeelani Syed, Rehan Ahmad, Ali Al Bataineh et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges

This survey systematically analyze threat surfaces across intra-execution loops and interaction planes, formulate a multi-layered zero-trust defense-in-depth architecture integrating Dual-LLM isolation, Capability-Based Access Control, kernel eBPF probes, and sandboxed runtimes, and map technical controls to internatio...

Seyedakbar Mostafavi · 0 citations
#large language models Open access Sep 2026

Data poisoning in LLM multiagent societies: Social proof drives collective decision failure in financial deliberation

Large language model (LLM) multiagent systems are increasingly deployed for high‐stakes financial deliberation, but individually secure LLMs may become vulnerable when embedded in a peer‐to‐peer agent society. We study data poisoning in such societies using Moltbook, a deliberation test bed modeled after the agent‐on...

Jeongsuk Park, Yu-Ji Lim, Geonwoo Kim et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

MetaPermit: Scalable and Auditable Access Control for AI Agents via LLM-Inferred Meta-Attributes

The results show that MetaPermit produces 31% more consistent authorization decisions than LLM-driven authorization and outperforms the state-of-the-art defenses CaMeL and IPIGuard in both task completion and robustness to IPI attacks, with no malicious tool calls executed.

Han-Zhang Ma, Alicia Y. Hariri, Tian-Xiang Shen et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

The Privacy Paradox of Agentic CrowdRE: when LLM Pipelines Harvest More Than You Intend

Crowd-Based Requirements Engineering (CrowdRE) increasingly relies on multi-step large language model (LLM) pipelines to elicit, classify, and prioritize requirements from large volumes of user-generated content. Unlike prior batch natural-language-processing (NLP) tools, these agentic pipelines maintain persistent mem...

Rajat Khanna, Jatin Nandal · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.