A theoretical analysis that characterizes the trade-off controlled by entropic regularization and establishes a task-agnostic minimax bound for cold-start selection and a novel Sinkhorn-based CSAL algorithm, termed $\epsilon$-Adaptive Selection ($\epsilon$-AS).
Abstract
Cold-Start Active Learning (CSAL) aims to select a valuable subset from an unlabeled pool without any prior knowledge or human assistance. Existing methods take diverse routes based on typicality, coverage, or diversity. Each rests on its own inductive bias and therefore performs well on some tasks yet poorly on others. We argue that the real challenge is not to design yet another selection heuristic, but to make CSAL adapt automatically to the data and task at hand. To this end, we revisit CSAL through the lens of optimal transport. First, we propose a generalized transport selection framework that reveals the shared allocation structure of existing methods and exactly subsumes representative formulations. Second, we introduce a theoretical analysis that characterizes the trade-off controlled by entropic regularization and establishes a task-agnostic minimax bound for cold-start selection. These results provide a principled foundation for adapting the regularization strength to the unlabeled data. Third, we derive a data-adaptive regularization rule and present a novel Sinkhorn-based CSAL algorithm, termed $\epsilon$-Adaptive Selection ($\epsilon$-AS). Extensive experiments on six public datasets and multiple annotation budgets show that $\epsilon$-AS consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance. On ImageNet-1k, it improves the average accuracy over ActiveFT by 1.29% while reducing selection time by 56.2%. Code will be released at https://github.com/Z-yiwei/OT-CSAL
Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) make predictions inspectable and intervenable by routing them through human-interpretable concepts, but originally required concept annotations. Annotation-free variants remove this requirement, but typically use large concept vocabularies, static at both training and inference, produci...
Wolfgang Stammer, Sukrut Rao, Hevra Petekkaya et al.· 0 citations
The result is a practical way to separate two failure modes that are usually mixed together: a weak selector versus an information channel that cannot support the desired decision in the first place.
This work proposes When2Think, an RLVR-based post-training framework for instance-adaptive computation allocation that requires neither a learned reward model nor a learned critic, and offline reference caching avoids online reference-model queries during policy updates.
Jaejun Shim, Hyunjin Kim, Young Jin Kim et al.· 0 citations
Data-centric scaling of RLVR has focused on collecting or generating verifiable training problems. However, corpus size alone does not determine whether the dataset provides a useful learning signal for a target policy. To guide the synthesis of effective RLVR data, we experimentally characterize dataset effectiveness...
Ximing Lu, Aviral Kumar, Jan Kautz et al.· 0 citations
Vision-language reward models are trained on annotated preference pairs, which are expensive to collect, can disagree, and are ranked by benchmark accuracy. We build one with no human preference label: a linear head on an intermediate layer of a frozen Qwen3-VL backbone, trained to score a web caption above a perturbed...
Yue-Ying Li, Jing-Xuan Fan, Kianté Brantley et al.· 0 citations
A research path from few-shot learning to meta-learning, in-context learning, and data-efficient agentic systems is summarized, which concludes that limited supervision can be made useful by the right priors, the right adaptation mechanism, and the right way to reuse experience.
Ya-Qing Wang· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.