Sep 2026· International Journal of Informatics and Communication Technology (IJ-ICT)· 0 citations· 59 references
TL;DR
This paper analyses various recent state-of-the-art variants of large language models (LLMs) and neural machine translation (NMT) for Indian languages in comparison to statistical machine translation (SMT) and tackles key questions, such as idiomatic expressions, morphologically complex grammar or the scarceness of parallel corpora.
Abstract
Significant advances have been achieved in machine translation (MT) in recent times, particularly state of the art (SOTA) models for languages like English and Indian having distinct grammatical structures and limited monolingual training data. This paper analyses various recent state-of-the-art variants of large language models (LLMs) and neural machine translation (NMT) for Indian languages in comparison to statistical machine translation (SMT). It tackles key questions, such as idiomatic expressions, morphologically complex grammar or the scarceness of parallel corpora. Furthermore, it studies bytewise BPE, compares translation models in terms of BLEU scores using separate and shared-vocabulary representation with copy actions between the BPE translations, and analyses how multitask learning (Caruana (1997)) and attention mechanisms can contribute to the quality of translation. In summary, it provides directions for future work by suggesting new avenues of research including better curated datasets, more efficient approaches for lowresource languages and culturally aware translations.
The evaluation of various NMT and LLM architectures specifically for Croatian from/to English and Spanish demonstrates that open–source models can achieve, and occasionally surpass, the quality of Google Translate, a widely used commercial NMT system.
Antoni Oliver, Sergi Álvarez–Vidal· Suvremena Lingvistika· 1 citation
It is concluded that dedicated multilingual pretraining and large-scale parallel-corpus construction, rather than generic multilingual scaling alone, are the primary drivers of translation-quality gains for Indian vernacular languages, and identifies dialectal and code-mixed language coverage as the central future rese...
Dr. R. Sugunthakunthalambigai, Dr. Mallanna Biradar, Dr. Joyir Siram et al.· Anusandhanvallari· 0 citations
The findings show that manual transliteration consistently yields the best translation performance, while noisy automatic romanization reduces these gains, and that LLM-based translation can be competitive with, and in some settings outperform, fine-tuned NMT systems, although this advantage comes with lower interpreta...
A. Mansurova, Meruert Bekmukhamedova, Bekarys Baibolat et al.· Electronics· 0 citations
The proposed framework combines multiple linguistic processing stages including POS tagging, NE detection, clause boundary analysis, contextual token handling, syntactic structure preparation, and morphology-related processing and can be effectively integrated with both conventional machine translation architectures an...
Prashant Chaudhary, Pavan Kurariya, Jahnavi Bodhankar et al.· NLP & Big Data· 0 citations
The translationese content of MLLM generations is assessed and the key features that distinguish MLLM-generated text from typical translation-related interference are examined.
Maria R. Valentini, Téa Wright, Julisa Granados et al.· 0 citations
This study highlights the importance of integrating in-depth linguistic analysis, contextual semantic modelling, and cultural awareness into natural language processing-based translation systems by combining traditional linguistic insights with computational methods.
Hilal Abdul-Raziq Sadiq, Zaxid Maxmudovich Islamov, R. Matibaeva et al.· Digital Technologies Researc...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.