The Entropy-Scaled Trust Region (ESTR), which scales each token’s off-policy deviation by its local entropy, requiring no auxiliary forward passes or explicit version-switch detection, consistently outperforms existing asynchronous methods and achieves the best train-inference consistency.
Abstract
Asynchronous reinforcement learning (RL) accelerates large language model (LLM) post-training by overlapping rollout generation with policy optimization, but the resulting stale, off-policy data can destabilize optimization and ultimately cause policy collapse. Existing methods typically retain or discard tokens based solely on the magnitude of their importance ratios, applying the same threshold uniformly across token positions. In this work, we reveal that the natural scale of the importance ratio varies systematically with token entropy. Under asynchronous dynamics, this entropy-ratio scaling dictates two distinct phenomena: at low entropy, the inherent train-inference discrepancy is drastically amplified into substantial sampling noise; at high entropy, in-flight weight updates naturally induce pronounced, legitimate exploratory deviations. Consequently, magnitude-only correction inadvertently admits the amplified noise while strictly masking out the essential exploration triggered by in-flight updates. To address this, we propose the Entropy-Scaled Trust Region (ESTR), which scales each token's off-policy deviation by its local entropy, requiring no auxiliary forward passes or explicit version-switch detection. Across long-horizon agentic tasks and mathematical reasoning benchmarks, ESTR consistently outperforms existing asynchronous methods and achieves the best train-inference consistency. It reaches $37.34$ avg@1 on BrowseComp-Plus and $95.69$ on multi-turn GSM8K, matching synchronous GRPO while achieving a $2.6\times$ speedup.
Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based post-training has become a key mechanism for improving reasoning Large Language Models (LLMs), especially when automated verifiers enable Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR). Recent methods, however, are increasingly modular: many apparent algorithmic advances recombin...
Liu Yang, Han Zhu, Zheng-Yang Zhong et al.· International Conference on...· 2 citations
Temperature-Grouped Reinforcement Learning (TGRL), which turns temperature-induced diversity into an explicit training signal, and reaches equivalent accuracy up to 36% faster than strong RLVR baselines without expanding the rollout budget.
Zi-Han Lin, Xiao-Han Wang, Jie Cao et al.· 0 citations
Critic-free reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) for agentic large language models is often done through GRPO-style methods, which compute a group baseline over repeated rollouts to reduce target variance. However, this setup is ill-suited to agents acting in stateful environments such as live services or security sandboxes...
Joery A. de Vries, Neil D. Lawrence, Zhen-Wen Dai· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards improves reasoning, while the allocation of learning signal shapes which solutions remain accessible under repeated sampling. Group-relative objectives assign equal advantages to equally rewarded responses, making aggregate credit proportional to sampled mode frequency. We...
Hang-Zhan Jin, Mohammad Hamdaqa, D. Precup· 0 citations
The results challenge the view that on-policy rollouts are inherently preferable and show that their value depends critically on the objective, evaluation setting, and optimisation hyperparameters.
Julianna Piskorz, Antonin Berthon, M. van der Schaar· 1 citation
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet their predictions remain sensitive to task-irrelevant prompt features. We investigate this sensitivity through semifactual prompt interventions that preserve the underlying problem and its...
Jun-Shu Pan, Zhi-Zhang Fu, Shu-Lin Huang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.