The proposed IRIS (Identity Representations from Internal States), a training-free framework that constructs for each entity an iris-like signature encoding its distinctive and stable identity characteristics, thereby forming a shared space in which each entity is encoded once and can be aligned across different KGs through direct similarity comparison.
Abstract
Entity alignment (EA) identifies entities across knowledge graphs (KGs) that refer to the same real-world object. Conventional EA methods mainly exploit explicit graph structures and textual fields, which often provide insufficient semantic understanding to recognize the same entity under heterogeneous descriptions and distinguish it from semantically similar entities. Although large language models (LLMs) offer deeper entity understanding, existing LLM-based EA methods largely use this capability for auxiliary generation or candidate-conditioned decisions. Consequently, such understanding is not distilled into a stable and directly comparable identity space, leaving alignment tied to specific KG pairs or candidate sets and requiring repeated processing as the matching context changes. To address these limitations, we propose IRIS (Identity Representations from Internal States), a training-free framework that constructs for each entity an iris-like signature encoding its distinctive and stable identity characteristics. IRIS derives these signatures by eliciting identity-oriented contextual representations from a frozen LLM, thereby forming a shared space in which each entity is encoded once and can be aligned across different KGs through direct similarity comparison, without pair-dependent representation construction or candidate-wise LLM inference. Across four established EA benchmarks and two frozen LLM backbones, the best IRIS variants achieve Hits@1 scores of 100.00, 99.38, 98.31, and 97.99 on D-Y-15K V2, DBP-WIKI, ICEWS-WIKI, and ICEWS-YAGO, respectively.
General-purpose text embedding models are designed to capture semantic similarity but are not optimised for distinguishing entity records that represent the same real-world business or person. This limitation affects applications such as entity resolution and duplicate record retrieval, where small textual differences...
Khajesh Sapram, S. Raju, Kishore Konda· 0 citations
Entity matching is a fundamental task in a wide range of retrieval and knowledge applications, aiming to identify whether two objects correspond to the same real-world entity across heterogeneous sources. Typical variants include entity resolution (ER), entity linking (EL), and entity alignment (EA). While recent unifi...
Ziheng Zhang, Weixin Zeng, Jiuyang Tang et al.· Annual International ACM SIG...· 0 citations
The factors underlying performance differences across matcher architectures are clarified and motivate future research and benchmark designs that better disentangle architectural choices from model-level factors while explicitly evaluating distribution shift and cross-dataset transferability.
A new method, Pair INterpretation for Entity matching (PINE), which takes two records as input, and outputs correlated token pairs as an explanation for an entity-matching decision, demonstrating that the extracted token pairs exhibit strong correlations and serve as interpretable evidence for matching records.
Hironori Mizuguchi, H. Kitagawa· The VLDB journal· 0 citations
A joint-embedding framework, MulF-ELMo-BERT, suitable for entity alignment in cultural relic knowledge graphs, integrating multi-dimensional features such as entity names, attributes, summaries, and full-text texts, and achieves comprehensive extraction of entity features from four levels.
Min Zhang, Lu-Ya Yang, Ya-Xian Gao et al.· International Journal of Com...· 0 citations
This paper describes the ingestion and ontology-tagging layer that turns a validated extraction stream into a knowledge graph of 537,157 entities and 2,198,567 relationships drawn from 98,795 government documents, and describes a record-identity ladder that decides sameness from identifier columns, name columns, displa...
Vaibhav Dangaich, Kevin Lewis, Kundeshwar Pundalik· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.