Skip to content
Preprint

Stronger Lower Bounds for (Non-)Anytime Acceleration of Gradient Descent

Sep 2026 · 5 citations · ⚡ 2 influential · 21 references
Mathematics

TL;DR

Stronger lower bounds are established for GD's convergence rate in both settings: $\Omega(N^{-1.450})$ for the non-anytime rate bound and $\Omega(N^{-1.184})$ for the anytime rate barrier.

Abstract

The rate-optimal convergence rate of gradient descent (GD) with a fixed step-size is well known to be $\Theta(N^{-1})$ for $L$-Lipschitz smooth convex objectives in the prior art in convex optimization. Surprisingly, several recent works show that we can accelerate vanilla GD by applying a nonconstant, nonadaptive, deterministic step-size schedule. The best-known upper bounds so far in the non-anytime&anytime setups are $O(N^{-1.271})$ [Altschuler and Parrilo, 2025, Grimmer et al., 2023] and $O(N^{-1.119})$ [Zhang et al., 2025], respectively. On the other hand, the best reported lower bounds (or barriers) up to date in the non-anytime&anytime setups are $\Omega(N^{-1.635})$ and $\Omega(N^{-1.241})$ [Ye and Liu, 2026], respectively. We narrow these gaps by establishing stronger lower bounds for GD's convergence rate in both settings: $\Omega(N^{-1.450})$ for the non-anytime rate bound and $\Omega(N^{-1.184})$ for the anytime rate barrier.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

A lower bound for stepsize-based acceleration of gradient descent

This work presents a new lower bound of $\Omega(T^{-1.9319})$ for the last-iterate convergence rate of gradient descent with predetermined nonnegative stepsize schedules, and provides rigorous evidence that stepsize schedules alone cannot accelerate plain GD to the optimal $O(T^{-2})$ convergence rate.

Jian-Hao Ma, Yu-Xin Chen · 8 citations · ⚡2
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Improved Gradient Descent Lower Bounds Beyond Nesterov

The anytime lower bound shows that the rate of non-anytime silver schedules (Altschuler and Parrilo, 2025; Grimmer et al., 2025) is unattainable in the anytime setting, and establishes a strict separation between the two settings.

Yu-Tian Ye, Kai-Zhao Liu · 6 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Improving the Last-Iterate Guarantees of Anytime Algorithms for Stochastic Monotone Variational Inequalities

We analyze a stochastic algorithm with Halpern-type anchoring for constrained convex-concave problems and monotone variational inequalities. This single-loop and single-call algorithm uses one unbiased sample of the gradient operator at every iteration, to be applicable to monotone games with noisy feedback. With $t$ d...

Jun-Hyun Kim, Ahmet Alacaoglu · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

The Exact Time-Uniform Rate Frontier for Stochastic Gradient Descent on Smooth Convex Objectives

We study the time-uniform convergence of the raw iterate of standard stochastic gradient descent (SGD) for unconstrained smooth convex objectives. We prove that, under standard noise assumptions, the time-uniform convergence rate gets arbitrarily close to $\sqrt{\log n / n}$ but never reaches it. More specifically, we...

Rui-Jie Li, Kang Chen, Tian-Yu Wang · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

The First-Order Oracle Complexity of Lipschitz Convex Optimization in Nondual Settings

We study first-order black-box convex optimization over an $\ell_p$-ball for objectives Lipschitz in the $\ell_q$-norm, solving in the affirmative the nonsmooth version of the COLT open question (Guz15b) on whether the geometry of a smaller feasible set ($p<q$) can improve convergence rates in convex optimization, and...

David Martínez-Rubio, Brian Bullins, Cristóbal Guzmán et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.