Skip to content
Conference

Context-RCA: A Context-Controlled Multi-Agent Framework for Root Cause Analysis in Microservice Systems

Jul 2026 · Fall Joint Computer Conference · pp. 327-332 · 0 citations · 24 references

Abstract

Root cause analysis (RCA) in microservice systems is challenging because observable symptoms often propagate along service dependencies and become separated from the actual underlying cause. Recent large language model (LLM)-based agent frameworks have shown promise for automating RCA, but existing methods still suffer from uncontrolled context growth, weakly constrained diagnostic workflows, and unreliable conclusions under inconsistent evidence from multiple sources. To address these issues, we propose Context-RCA, a context-controlled multi-agent framework for microservice fault diagnosis. Context-RCA has three key components. First, it uses selective context injection to organize agent inputs through domain isolation, stage awareness, and dynamic context updates. Second, it uses an SOP-driven workflow to enforce structured diagnosis across stages and prevent premature conclusions before sufficient evidence is collected. Third, it uses iterative consensus verification to cross-check hypotheses against logs, metrics, and traces and refine judgments from observed symptoms to deeper root causes. Experiments on 400 fault cases from the 2025 International AIOps Challenge dataset show that Context-RCA achieves an overall score of 65.93 on DeepSeek-V3.2 and 60.06 on GPT-4o, outperforming the strongest baseline by 14.21% and 24.30%, respectively. Context-RCA also improves fault localization and root cause description quality. Ablation results further show that selective context injection contributes a 5.51% gain, confirming context control as a primary factor in reliable RCA with LLMs.

View source

Similar papers

Aug 2026

ChatRCA: A Root Cause Analysis Method via LLMs-based Multi-Agent with Human-in-the-Loop

Root cause analysis (RCA) underpins cloud reliability by correlating anomalous signals to identify incident causes. Existing LLM-based RCA methods show promise, but monolithic LLM pipelines often under-capture RCA's structured workflow, while fully automated reasoning lacks calibrated uncertainty handling and expert ov...

Mingxuan Hui, Lu Wang, Qing-Shan Li et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

DCFA: Dual-view Causal-inspired Attribution for Failure Reasoning in LLM-based Multi-agent Systems

DCFA is proposed, a training-free framework for failure attribution that integrates a global module that constructs structured causal-inspired dependency graphs from system traces to identify the initial decisive error, and a local module that applies local counterfactual-inspired reasoning to refine causal-inspired at...

Ze-Hao Wang, Lanjun Wang, Shi-Long Jin et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Localizing Post-Wire Semantic Changes in MCP Agent Frameworks

Valid Model Context Protocol (MCP) messages do not guarantee that an agent framework preserves the distinctions downstream software needs. We present a differential testing method that follows a fixed tool result through each framework's public interfaces and checks explicit consumer requirements. Applied to 18 designe...

Aditi Patodiya · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

EAVer: Long-Form Factuality Verification as an End-to-End Agentic Policy

This work introduces EAVer, an End-to-end Agentic Verifier that learns to control the complete response-level verification workflow as a unified policy, and construct 794 bidirectional same-trajectory preference pairs that keep claim grouping, search, and evidence fixed, enabling decision-focused Direct Preference Opti...

Ke-Ning Zheng, Ao-Ying Zheng, Zhi-Gang Chang et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Reconceptualizing Observability for Agentic AI Systems: A Trace-Centric Architecture for Interpreting Non-Deterministic Workflow Behavior

The more typical feature of agentic AI systems is dynamic, multistep workflows where autonomous components plan, reason, and communicate with external tools and data sources in a series of iterations. Such flexibility increases capability but also brings nondeterminism which is inherent and where the same inputs can re...

Ankur Gupta, Karan Gupta, Divyakumar Deepak Savla et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

Maat: Independent Deterministic Contract-Based Governance for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows

Maat is presented, a runtime governance layer that validates agent-to-agent handoffs against a versioned workflow contract, or anchor, with no language model in the validation or scoring path and the results support deterministic handoff validation for contract-expressible defects.

Uliana Elina · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.