Skip to content
Open access

Integrative bulk and single-cell transcriptomics identify a recurrence-prognostic risk model with exploratory associations with treatment-response phenotypes in colorectal cancer

Aug 2026 · Human Cell · Vol 39 · 0 citations · 58 references
Medicine

TL;DR

A READ-derived response-associated gene signature for recurrence stratification and exploratory cross-cohort evaluation in additional colorectal cancer cohorts, while further exploring its association with treatment-response phenotypes.

Abstract

Chemoresistance remains a major obstacle to improving outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly among patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy. Here, we developed a READ-derived response-associated gene signature for recurrence stratification and performed exploratory cross-cohort evaluation in additional colorectal cancer cohorts, while further exploring its association with treatment-response phenotypes. In the GSE190826 cohort, pathological complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR status was used as a clinically annotated treatment-response phenotype for downstream screening. Using differential expression analysis in TCGA-READ, we identified 4277 differentially expressed genes and constructed a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to define clinically relevant modules. Genes from READ-related modules were further screened by logistic regression in GSE190826 and univariate Cox regression in TCGA-READ, yielding six prognostic genes associated with pathological non-response. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)–Cox regression subsequently refined these candidates to a four-gene signature, including ENHO, BLACAT1, LEMD1, and ASNS, which was used to establish a READ-derived response-associated gene (RDRG) risk score. High-risk patients showed poorer recurrence-free survival in the TCGA-READ training set and an exploratory TCGA-READ testing subset, and exploratory evaluations in additional colorectal cancer cohorts (TCGA-COAD and GSE17536) showed similar recurrence-stratification trends, with moderate time-dependent AUC values in TCGA-READ (3-year AUC = 0.766; 5-year AUC = 0.714). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that the risk score remained associated with RFS after adjustment for clinical covariates, and a nomogram incorporating disease stage provided additional exploratory prognostic stratification. The RDRG score also showed only modest and exploratory associations with treatment-response phenotypes across multiple datasets. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis revealed that malignant cells contributed the highest risk scores, with enrichment of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), KRAS signaling, coagulation, and hypoxia-related programs in high-risk tumor cells. Among the four genes, LEMD1 showed the strongest malignant-cell enrichment and was further examined in functional assays, where LEMD1 knockdown reduced CRC cell migration and increased 5-FU sensitivity, supporting its role as a candidate functional contributor rather than a validated mechanistic driver. Collectively, the RDRG risk score may serve as a READ-derived model for recurrence stratification, with exploratory cross-cohort applicability in broader colorectal cancer cohorts and exploratory associations with treatment-response phenotypes. The same risk-score formula was applied across cohorts, whereas high- and low-risk thresholds were cohort-specific rather than fixed from the training cohort.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

Seven-Gene Signature and Immune Microenvironment as Determinants of Survival Rate in Colorectal Carcinoma

A seven-gene immune-related prognostic signature that, combined with clinicopathological parameters, provides a robust tool for individualized survival prediction and may guide precision management in CRC patients is developed and validated.

Vincenzo Rallo, Matteo Massidda, Xiaofen Wen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Single-cell analyses reveal a simple multi-gene transcriptomic signature with predictive power in prognosis and therapy effectiveness in triple-negative breast cancer

Re-analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing data characterizes the diverse cell subtypes within the tumor and microenvironment of TNBC, supporting a luminal progenitor origin for the cancer and providing clues as to the factors involved in progression of the disease.

G. Davidson, V. Debien, Tom Sexton · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

CMA-associated cellular state remodeling defines prognostic heterogeneity and identifies ARRDC3 as a protective functional gene in small cell lung cancer

Functional validation of ARRDC3 further supports the biological relevance of this model, providing new insights into SCLC molecular risk stratification and CMA-associated resistance states.

Jia-Hong Han, Shun Xu, Yunfeng Jiang · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Integrated single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses identify TRIP6 as a prognostic and EMT-associated biomarker in colorectal cancer

It is suggested that TRIP6 may be involved in linking microenvironmental signaling to invasive phenotypes, with potential value for prognostic stratification and therapeutic exploration.

Qiwei Cui, Xiao-Hong Gao, Xiaoqing Wu et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

A radiotherapy-related fibrosis gene signature-based risk model for predicting prognosis and immunological features in lung adenocarcinoma.

A six-gene-fibrosis-based prognostic model based on six genes stratifies survival risk and correlates with immune features and drug sensitivity, but provides a preliminary framework requiring prospective clinical validation.

Yanyan Qiu, Cui Lv, Shu-Bo Ding · 0 citations
Open access Jan 2026

Integrative Multiomics Analysis Reveals a Cancer Stem Cell–Driven Prognostic Signature and Nominates Belinostat for Targeted Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This study establishes a novel CSC–associated gene signature for diagnosis and prognosis in HCC and nominates belinostat as a repurposing candidate for targeting stemness‐related pathways, offering a promising strategy for personalized therapy.

Yang Zi, Ying Zhang, Jun Wu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.