Skip to content

Tatarstan Toponyms: A Bilingual Dataset and Hybrid RAG System for Geospatial Question Answering

May 2026 · Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria · Vol abs/2605.05962 · 0 citations · 35 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

An architecture combining two key components is proposed: a hybrid retriever that integrates dense semantic indexing using multilingual-e5-large with a geospatial filter and ranking (KD-trees, haversine distance), and an extractive reader based on fine-tuned transformer models.

Abstract

This paper addresses the end-to-end task of automatic geospatial question answering over multilingual toponymic data. An original bilingual (Russian–Tatar) dataset of toponyms of the Republic of Tatarstan is introduced, comprising 9,688 structured records with detailed linguistic, etymological, administrative, and coordinate information (93.1% of objects are georeferenced). Based on this dataset, a specialized question-answering corpus of approximately 39,000 “question–context–extractable answer” triples is constructed, with guaranteed answer localization within the text. To solve the task, an architecture combining two key components is proposed: a hybrid retriever that integrates dense semantic indexing using multilingual-e5-large with a geospatial filter and ranking (KD-trees, haversine distance), and an extractive reader based on fine-tuned transformer models. On 500 test queries, the hybrid search achieves Recall@1 = 0.988, Recall@5 = 1.000, and MRR = 0.994, statistically significantly outperforming both BM25 and the purely spatial method. Among the tested reader architectures (RuBERT, XLM-RoBERTa-large, T5-RUS), the best answer extraction quality is attained by the multilingual XLM-RoBERTa-large model: EM = 0.992, F1 = 0.994. A contrasting effect is observed: on raw outputs, RuBERT-based models fail to answer coordinate-related questions (F1 = 0), whereas XLM-RoBERTa-large achieves F1 = 0.984; however, simple post-processing completely eliminates the gaps in numerical values and restores RuBERT accuracy to 100%. This discrepancy is attributed to tokenization specifics and the composition of pre-training corpora. The created resources (dataset, QA corpus, trained model weights, and web demonstrator) are openly published on the Hugging Face platform. The obtained results can be directly applied in the development of geospatial question-answering services, geocoding systems, and digital humanities projects that benefit from etymological and multilingual place-name data.

View source

Similar papers

#edge computing Open access Aug 2026

A Systematic Comparison of RAG Architectures for Geographic POI Question Answering Using OpenStreetMap Data

It is suggested that, in dense-urban POI settings where coordinates are reliable, the marginal benefit of explicit graph edges shrinks for coordinate-computable relationships, while structured spatial processing complements vector retrieval.

Noboru Otsuka · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

IGT @ FinMMEval 2026 Task 2: Question-Type Prompting with Targeted Extraction for Multilingual Financial QA

We present the IGT system for PolyFiQA Task 2 of the FinMMEval Lab at CLEF 2026, a multilingual financial question answering task over English SEC filings and multilingual news articles (English, Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, Greek) for four companies. Our central observation is that the 344 development questions divide...

Yu-Wen Chiu · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.