SVI-DAG is proposed, a structured variational inference approach to Bayesian causal discovery using observational data and prior beliefs that uses normalizing flows to model dependencies between edges, supporting expressive and multimodal posterior learning over DAGs.
Abstract
Bayesian causal discovery seeks to determine the posterior distribution of causal theories, which are interpreted as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) that explain the observed data. The resulting posterior allows systematic reasoning regarding epistemic uncertainty within these theories. Nonetheless, finding such graphs is difficult due to identifiability problems and limited observational data. Furthermore, precisely approximating posterior over graphs is challenging given vast range of potential DAGs. Recent Bayesian approaches have addressed some of these challenges, yet they remain limited as they fail to encode dependencies between edges, and lack principled ways to incorporate domain knowledge as inductive biases during the search process. To overcome these limitations, we propose SVI-DAG, a structured variational inference approach to Bayesian causal discovery using observational data and prior beliefs that uses normalizing flows to model dependencies between edges, supporting expressive and multimodal posterior learning over DAGs. To mitigate mode seeking behaviour in evidence lower bound optimization and promote mode coverage, we use stein variational gradient descent to update the node potentials using a kernel in acyclicity space. We evaluate SVI-DAG against 5 state-of-the-art Bayesian DAG learning methods and demonstrate competitive performance in terms of both accuracy and uncertainty quantification.
This work considers the task of conditional causal discovery as a Bayesian inference problem, in which the posterior is targeted over causal graphs and parameters conditional on an event such as a causal-effect constraint, and adapts rare-event estimation techniques to perform inference the joint graph-parameter space.
Cixuan Zhang, Guy Van den Broeck, Benjie Wang· 0 citations
Causal Discovery (CD) from observational data faces two fundamental challenges. First, purely statistical methods often lack the power to resolve structural ambiguities in low-sample regimes. Second, although LLM-assisted hybrid approaches improve structure recovery through semantic reasoning, the influence of that rea...
A. Thorat, Ravi Kolla, Vishak K Bhat et al.· 0 citations
DAG-FM is proposed, a novel foundation model architecture that amortizes causal discovery and introduces Mixture-of-Leaf-Experts (MoLE) to handle diverse and unknown Functional Causal Model (FCM) assumptions in real-world scenarios.
Bayesian causal discovery is widely used for its ability to quantify epistemic uncertainty over directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) through posterior inference. However, its behaviour under latent confounding remains poorly understood, as existing work typically notes that confounding breaks identifiability without characte...
Debargha Ghosh, S. Renooij, A. V. Kononova· arXiv.org· 0 citations
The results show that representing both sources as probabilistic uncertainty over edge existence and orientation is a practical and effective way to improve causal graph accuracy.
N. K. Kitson, Anthony C. Constantinou· 0 citations
A Laplace-approximated Bayesian scoring function for the non-conjugate Normal--Gamma prior is developed and, through the DAG-probit extension, predicts malignancy from nuclear morphometry with a cross-validated ROC-AUC of $0.94$ using a sparse, interpretable set of direct predictors.
Samaneh Nazari, Mohammad Arashi, Abdolnasser Sadeghkhani· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.