Performance Comparison of Classical and Robust Control Strategies for a Lower-Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton

Abstract

Lower-limb rehabilitation exoskeletons have emerged as a promising complementary technology to conventional therapy, enabling repetitive, intensive, and personalized gait training. However, achieving accurate trajectory tracking while maintaining robustness against parametric uncertainties, external disturbances, and unpredictable human–robot interaction remains a significant control challenge due to the highly nonlinear dynamics of coupled human–exoskeleton systems. This paper presents an experimental performance comparison of five control strategies for gait rehabilitation exoskeletons, including a classical proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller, a model-based proportional–derivative controller with gravity compensation (PD+G), a computed torque sliding mode controller (CT-SMC), a computed torque–super-twisting sliding mode controller (CT–ST-SMC) and a hybrid backstepping–super-twisting sliding mode controller (BS–ST-SMC). All the controllers were implemented on the same lower-limb rehabilitation exoskeleton under identical operating conditions. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed BS–ST-SMC architecture outperforms classical and traditional robust approaches, particularly in mitigating chattering and managing human–robot interaction uncertainties. Specifically, the BS–ST-SMC achieved the highest tracking precision with a mean squared position error (MSEp) of 1.32×10−3rad2 and effectively synchronized with the user by reducing the phase lag to just 4.22° at the knee joint. Their overall performance was evaluated using the following metrics: mean squared position error (MSEP), mean squared velocity error (MSEv), peak error, phase lag, jerk index, peak torque, and peak power.