Skip to content
Preprint

Forgotten in Weights, Recovered by Tools: Agentic Tool Unlearning for LLM Agents

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 35 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Experiments on RWKU and MUSE across different LLM architectures show that ATU achieves a better balance between target forgetting and retained utility, making unlearning more robust under tool-augmented agent deployment.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as tool-augmented agents, where responses can depend on tool calls and external observations rather than model parameters alone. This creates an evaluation mismatch for LLM unlearning: previous unlearning methods may suppress direct parametric recall, but an agent can still recover the same forget target through tools such as web search, retrieval, or database lookup. We identify this failure mode as tool-mediated recovery and study agentic tool unlearning, which aims to reduce both parametric recall and tool-mediated recovery while preserving normal tool use for retained knowledge. To address this challenge, we propose Agentic Tool Unlearning (ATU), a two-stage framework. The first stage applies parametric knowledge unlearning to suppress direct recall, while the second stage performs trajectory-level reinforcement learning in simulated tool-augmented environments to penalize target-seeking tool behavior and final-answer leakage. Experiments on RWKU and MUSE across different LLM architectures show that ATU achieves a better balance between target forgetting and retained utility, making unlearning more robust under tool-augmented agent deployment.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Retry, Switch, or Abstain? Learning Strategy-Aware Tool-Use Policies via Controlled Error Injection

Tool-using LLM agents are commonly trained and evaluated in environments where tool calls succeed reliably, yet deployed tools can fail transiently, persistently, or silently. Robust recovery therefore requires more than repeated retries: an agent may need to retry the same path, switch to an alternative, or recognize...

Chao-Ran Chen, Vylinh J. Nguyen, Zi-Ji Zhang et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

UnifiedPlayers: Enhance Tool-Integrated Reasoning in Agentic Reinforcement Learning

UnifiedPlayers, a cooperative framework comprising a Planning Player that generates tasks, an Execution Player that produces multi-turn trajectories with Python tool calls, and an Evaluation Player that constructs executable verifiers, highlights cooperation among specialized players as a promising path toward self-enh...

Wen-Jie Liao, Liang Zhao, Ze-Hong Cao · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

AgentBrew: Offline Tool-Use Agent Learning from Raw Real-World Trajectories

AgentBrew is proposed, an offline training framework that learns effective tool-use policies from a single batch of raw interaction trajectories, without task verifiers or iterative on-policy rollouts, and demonstrates that fine-grained offline learning can recover useful supervision from raw trajectories that filterin...

Zhiyi Lyu, Ye-Wen Li, Long-Tao Zheng et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

MM-VeriAgent: Learning to Use Extensive Tools to Verify Multimodal Misinformation with Reinforcement Learning

Real-world multimodal misinformation often involves mixed forgery sources, requiring sample-specific detection strategies. Existing tool-augmented methods rely on predefined workflows or inference-time planning, limiting adaptability or increasing inference cost. To address this issue, we introduce \textbf{MM-VeriAgent...

Pei-Pei Li, Shu-Han Xia, Sheng-Yang Liu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Eliciting Self-Verification in Multimodal Reasoning Agents with Reinforcement Learning

Self-Verification via Reinforcement Learning (SVRL), an RL-only finetuning framework that trains multimodal agents to verify and filter retrieved evidence within their own reasoning traces, reducing reliance on external verifiers at inference time is presented.

Vishwas Sathish, Viresh Ranjan, Xin-Liang Zhu et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Do Agents Know When They Succeed? Calibrating Agent Confidence from Internal Representations

This paper investigates whether model's internal representations provide stronger signals of eventual task success in multi-turn agentic setups, and introduces two complementary methods: Latent Trajectory Dynamics (LTD) and the Action Representation Probe (ARP), which predicts success from representations formed at act...

Priyanka Mary Mammen, Emil Joswin, Srujananjali Medicherla · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.