How do we define an occupation? By its job title? An accountant at a small trading company keeps the books; at a listed firm the same title demands a certified-accountant licence, and the week goes to the reports that regulators and the board read. Same title, different bar, different work. What defines an occupation is who it lets in and what it asks them to do. In a rapidly changing labor market, tracking those requirements and tasks is how to take the market's pulse. Yet no instrument reads both at the speed they change. Official occupational directories like O*NET report one national average per occupation, updated every few years. Job postings are timely but unstructured. Research built on them works from job titles plus proprietary skill keywords, which blur what is asked of a candidate into what a candidate is asked to do. The blur matters, because rising requirements and changing tasks are different events with different causes. We separate them. From 752.6 million job ads posted on China's five leading recruitment platforms between 2022 and 2026, we extract the phrases employers write, unify those that name the same thing, and validate the mapping from text back to entry. By doing so we construct two catalogs, 20,721 requirements a candidate must meet and 44,479 tasks the hire will do. With the entries standardized, we annotate them further. Each task, for example, carries a score for how far a language model could absorb it. Matched back onto every ad, the catalogs read the market month by month. Two examples show what the layer beneath the job title buys. First, the occupational registry records one accountant where the ads record a staircase, the junior certificate at the bottom of the wage range and the intermediate one at the top. Second, counting occupations says the work most exposed to language models is disappearing, and counting tasks says far less of it is.
FLARE is proposed, a novel framework that endows VLAs with robust error recovery capabilities through a ``Retry" and ``Reset" Paradigm, and significantly improves task success and robustness.
Ganlong Zhao, Zijia Tang, Xingping Chen et al.· 3 citations
LifeSciBench is introduced, a benchmark of 750 expert-authored tasks designed to evaluate whether language models can handle realistic life science research work, with each constituent task paired with a human expert-written rubric.
Amelia Liu, Andrew Ho, Anne Marie Droste et al.· bioRxiv· 2 citations
General-purpose language models can reason and synthesize knowledge, but complex work also requires sustained interaction with files, information sources, and executable code, together with state maintenance, failure recovery, and verifiable delivery. We call this \emph{working capability}: sustained, verifiable progress toward a real-world objective. Apodex 1.1 develops this capability along two complementary dimensions. \emph{Environment Scaling} expands the diversity and verifiability of executable file, search, and code environments, while \emph{Agentic Coordination Scaling} trains agents to decompose long-horizon tasks, delegate parallel work, integrate asynchronous results, and replan. A shared execution harness and AgentOS maintain task state and provenance across tools and agents, and training turns environment trajectories and coordination traces into reliable behavior. Across complex professional work, finance, scientific research, mathematics, coding, and search, Apodex 1.1 reaches the leading performance band despite using a substantially smaller model than many frontier systems. The 35B-parameter Apodex 1.1 Mini further retains strong working capability in a locally deployable form. These results ground agentic intelligence in useful, verifiable work completed over time and advance our goal of building a \emph{Heavy-Duty Solver} for ambitious, long-running tasks.
Apodex Team B. An, B. Li, B. Wang et al.· 1 citation
The complex multi-energy coupling characteristics inherent to integrated energy system (IES) present unprecedented challenges for the implementation of low-carbon scheduling. Existing optimization methods often exhibit limitations in system scalability, algorithm adaptivity, and carbon reduction efficacy for complex IES. This paper proposes a Large Language Model (LLM)-Embedded Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (LEMARL) to address the aforementioned issues. The proposed method integrates the global perception capability of LLMs with the dynamic optimization capability of MARL. Specifically, the LLM-Embedded module generates high-quality reward functions and policy frameworks from a global perspective, while the MARL module leverages these LLM-generated strategies for distributed interactive iterations—greatly enhancing computation efficiency and scalability. Simulation results demonstrate that LEMARL reduces carbon emissions by 7.76% and simultaneously decreases operating costs by 4.49% in a small-scale IES. Furthermore, LEMARL also exhibits superior applicability and scalability in large-scale IES of the IEEE 141-bus power grid integrated with 51-node thermal system.
Chen Xia, Tong Gou, Yinliang Xu et al.· IEEE Transactions on Smart G...· 1 citation
Experimental results show that CritICL consistently outperforms standard in-context learning and achieves performance competitive with or superior to test-time scaling methods, while requiring significantly fewer generations and lower token cost.
Yu-Fan Wu, Ying-Hui He, Zheng-Yi Hu et al.· 1 citation
TestifAI, a deep learning testing framework for efficient and accurate estimation of robustness against combinations of perturbations, is proposed and partial model tomography is introduced, a novel approach to reconstructing model behaviour in a multi-perturbation space from tests that apply only a small number of perturbations.
Arooj Arif, T. Hartung, E. Botoeva et al.· 1 citation
A new method for surgically removing training examples from a model reveals that as datasets grow, the link between what a model learns and what it produces dissolves.
