Skip to content

MAPLE: Memory-Augmented Planning with Language and Evolution

Sep 2026 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces MAPLE (Memory-Augmented Planning with Language and Evolution), an agent for maintaining optimization problems through successive natural-language requests and introduces NLDO, a benchmark of 15 trajectories and 180 updates spanning selection, scheduling, rostering, routing, and cloud-resource placement.

Abstract

Domain practitioners understand their business constraints but may lack operations-research expertise or dedicated support. LLM-based optimization agents translate natural-language requirements into models or solver programs that established optimization tools can execute. This progress makes optimization more accessible, but real-world operations are dynamic: changing demand, resources, and priorities require updates to data, constraints, and objectives. Methods centered on isolated requests offer limited support for rapid adaptation that preserves earlier decisions and reuses useful search results. We introduce MAPLE (Memory-Augmented Planning with Language and Evolution), an agent for maintaining optimization problems through successive natural-language requests. MAPLE combines language-based problem construction with mathematical programming and evolutionary search. It retains the optimization program, accepted plans, earlier updates, and candidate solutions for subsequent requests. We introduce NLDO, a benchmark of 15 trajectories and 180 updates spanning selection, scheduling, rostering, routing, and cloud-resource placement. In the main evaluation, MAPLE completes all trajectories and achieves online scalar quality of 0.951 and a Pareto hypervolume ratio of 0.875. Controlled comparisons further show that maintaining executable state improves update validity and can preserve useful search information across substantial revisions.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Agentic AI-Assisted Modeling for Production Scheduling: Assessment in Constraint Programming

Developing optimization models for production scheduling requires substantial expert effort. Research on large language models (LLMs) has followed two directions: specialized approaches for automated modeling, mostly for mixed-integer linear programming, which often rely on dedicated training or problem-specific archit...

Ángel Sánchez-Fernández, J. Pernas-Álvarez, D. Crespo-Pereira · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

RobustSGPO: Search-Space Control for Agent Harness Evolution

This work introduces RobustSGPO, which specifies the requested edit, constructs and checks the patch, and continues search from either the incumbent or retained snapshots, and reduces source-task degradation after a shift, whereas random retention reaches a higher destination endpoint.

Zi-Bo Zhao, Ji-Jun Shi, Mo-Qing Zhou et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

APEX: An Extensible Model for Agent-Assisted Production Scheduling

This work presents APEX, an extensible production scheduling framework built around a general model and hybrid multiobjective search, and benchmarks eight APEX configurations against NSGA-II, SPEA2, MOEA/D and SMS-EMOA on 69 public job-shop instances, assessing workload completion time, total job flowtime and computati...

Felix Grumbach, S. Görlitz · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

HeurEvo: Agentic Evolution of Hybrid Solver-Augmented Heuristics for Time-Critical Mathematical Optimization

Recent advances in agentic heuristic design use AI agents and execution feedback to automate algorithm discovery for challenging optimization problems. In many practical settings, high-quality solutions must be obtained under strict runtime constraints, motivating hybrid approaches that combine problem-specific heurist...

Fei-Jie Wu, Hugo Barbalho, Konstantina Mellou et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Plan-and-Patch: Diffusion Language Models for Agentic Planning

Planning is increasingly important for long-horizon agents, where successful execution requires coordinating subgoals, tool use, and intermediate outcomes over many steps. Yet assumptions made during planning may be invalidated by the environment, tools may return unexpected results, or actions may fail. Effective agen...

Syamantak Kumar, Jiang Guo, Hassan Hamad et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.