Mosaic is presented, a training-free framework that formulates GraphRAG retrieval as a per-query control problem that converts query-specific evidence requirements into a bounded policy over seed selection, graph traversal, stopping, and evidence selection while the corpus graph, indexes, scoring functions, grounding procedure, and answer generator remain shared.
Abstract
Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) can connect evidence distributed across a corpus graph, but most systems use largely shared exploration procedures across queries. This creates a structural mismatch: direct facts may need compact local neighborhoods, comparisons need balanced coverage of multiple targets, and mediated questions may require deeper paths through weakly related connectors. We present Mosaic, a training-free framework that formulates GraphRAG retrieval as a per-query control problem. An LLM analyzer converts query-specific evidence requirements into a bounded policy over seed selection, graph traversal, stopping, and evidence selection, while the corpus graph, indexes, scoring functions, grounding procedure, and answer generator remain shared. On GraphRAG-Bench, Mosaic achieves query-weighted Answer Correctness of 76.97 on Medical and 64.33 on Novel, improving over the strongest previously reported overall results by 5.13 and 4.43 points. On Medical, it reaches 95.1 Evidence Recall and 86.1 Context Relevancy. Controlled comparisons on an identical graph and generator show that no fixed narrow, medium, or wide policy is consistently optimal; Mosaic improves by 9.96 points over the strongest canonical fixed policy. Relative to Fixed Wide, it evaluates 81.9% fewer paths and retains 47.2% fewer evidence items. Transfer experiments on HotpotQA, MuSiQue, and 2WikiMultiHopQA further show that the policy interface can be applied without benchmark-specific retriever training.
PoP-RAG is proposed, which features a passage-on-edge (PoE) graph that links the passages with graph edges to resolve the one-to-many entity-passage mapping problem and enables targeted retrieval for each sub-query and ensures transparent response derivation logic, thus enhancing explainability.
Xin-Tong Hu, Qi-Ming Zeng, Yu-Hao Lin et al.· Transactions on Graph Intell...· 0 citations
LiteRAG is presented, a graph-based retrieval method that replaces expensive retrieval-time LLM control with query-conditioned algorithmic exploration and reasoning-chain context construction and attains the highest overall quality among the evaluated methods.
Daniel Alejandro Coll Tejeda, Pedro García López, Daniel Barcelona-Pons· 0 citations
The proposed LineageRAG is a graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation method, which constructs one evidence for each query-derived evidence demand and completes it with a verbatim source span when the selected evidence supports that demand.
Lin-Yao Zheng, Xu-Hang Shi, Zhi-Fang Mao et al.· 0 citations
LivingRAG adds a writable experience store to a graph-based retrieval backbone, enabling verified experiences to be reused during inference in two ways, and analyzes online QA streams and finds reusable signals from shared entities, graph neighborhoods, and question templates.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems typically apply identical retrieval logic to all user queries, overlooking that different query intents depend on fundamentally different document relationships. We propose QMEG, a query-aware retrieval framework that constructs a multi-relational evidence graph with five ac...
Jia-Run Pan, Yu-Ling Fan, Li Ma et al.· 2026 3rd International Confe...· 0 citations
EffiRAG is presented, a graph-based RAG system designed to reduce this cost that uses the graph to locate relevant passages and generates answers from the original text, and preserves source information while keeping graph construction and query processing lightweight.
Yu-Zhong Zhang, Hao-Yang Ma, Chao Peng et al.· 0 citations