This work uses TabPFN v3 on three non-tabular classification problems, and finds that despite having no explicit access to the spatial or sequential structure characterizing the data, TabPFN v3 in some cases achieves accuracies comparable with that of models or methods geared specifically toward the corresponding tasks.
Abstract
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for machine learning on tabular data, offering the ability to generalize across datasets without task-specific training. Since many machine learning datasets can be represented as tables, this raises the question: does TFM capability extend beyond tasks traditionally regarded as tabular? We address this question by using TabPFN v3 on three non-tabular classification problems: handwritten digit recognition on MNIST, language identification of French and German words, and image classification on Tiny ImageNet. In each case, the original data are represented as rows of a table and classification is formulated as prediction of a missing label. We evaluate performance as a function of the number of context samples provided to the pretrained model, with no additional training or fine-tuning. Despite having no explicit access to the spatial or sequential structure characterizing the data, TabPFN v3 in some cases achieves accuracies comparable with that of models or methods geared specifically toward the corresponding tasks.
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) are becoming a powerful alternative to conventional tabular learning, adapting to new datasets in context without task-specific training. Current architectures, however, face a trade-off: models that preserve cell-level representations are expensive because they repeatedly attend across...
Representations of supervised datasets support higher-level machine-learning tasks such as dataset retrieval and distribution-shift monitoring. However, existing approaches typically rely either on hand-crafted meta-features or on dataset encoders trained specifically for representation learning. We introduce TabMF, a...
Rafiq Kamel, Nicolas Atienza, A. Fouché et al.· 0 citations
Tabular foundation models adapt to new datasets through in-context learning (ICL), and, like most transformers, they tie computational depth to the number of independently parameterized layers. We ask whether the ICL stage of such a model needs a distinct set of parameters for every layer, or only depth. We introduce T...
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) achieve strong predictive performance by conditioning on labeled demonstrations provided in context, without any parameter update. Yet how individual demonstrations shape a given prediction remains poorly understood. This gap matters in practice: the context is often assembled from what...
Yacine Benihaddadene, Milan Bhan, Eliot Dugelay et al.· 0 citations
In-context-learning Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) are uniquely suited to scenarios with limited resources or privacy constraints, as they solve new tasks without additional training. However, their architecture consists of multiple transformer blocks, resulting in high computational and memory footprints. Meanwhile,...
TabFM, a 400M-parameter tabular foundation model that formulates supervised tabular prediction as in-context learning, produces calibrated zero-shot predictions in a single forward pass without task-specific tuning.
Wei-Hao Kong, Erez Louidor Ilan, Shu-Xin Nie et al.· 24 citations· ⚡4
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.