Skip to content

When Activation Oracles Learn Not to Read: Concept-Specific Blind Spots in Fine-Tuned Oracles

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.23379 · 1 citation · 11 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is found that fine-tuned AOs can become concept-specific anti-readers: they selectively fail to recover the concept persistently present during their own training, raising a reliability concern for learned interpretability interfaces.

Abstract

Activation Oracles (AOs) are language models trained to answer natural-language questions about another model's internal activations. They offer a flexible interface for reading hidden information from model states, especially when relevant information is internally represented but absent or incomplete in visible behavior. However, AOs are themselves learned systems: their answers are shaped by training data, objectives, and learned reporting behavior, rather than being neutral readouts of represented information. We study this in a controlled Taboo Word Guessing setting, where subject models are fine-tuned to internally use a hidden concept while avoiding direct disclosure. Contrary to the expectation that an AO trained on such a subject becomes a specialist reader, we find that fine-tuned AOs can become concept-specific anti-readers: they selectively fail to recover the concept persistently present during their own training. This failure is not simply explained by absence of the concept from the subject or oracle representations: the target remains decodable inside the oracle, while LogitLens and layer-ablation analyses indicate that the failure arises in the AO readout pathway. Our results show that behavioral leakage, representation-level decodability, and AO-verbalizability can come apart, raising a reliability concern for learned interpretability interfaces.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Jul 2026

Train the Model, Not the Reader: Decodability Supervision for Verifiable Activation Explanations

Two audit protocols, the comparison of grounding and truth and the swap to an independent evaluator, and RECAP (Readable Encodings via Co-trained Auxiliary Predictors), linear heads trained alongside the target model to keep designated content decodable are contributed.

Hiskias Dingeto · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Knowledgeless Language Models: Suppressing Parametric Recall for Evidence-Grounded Language Modeling

The results demonstrate that suppressing entity-linked supervision during pretraining induces a shift in epistemic behavior: KLLMs rely less on parametric knowledge and more on external evidence, leading to improved reliability under realistic conditions, suggesting that pretraining-time control over knowledge acquisit...

Roi Cohen, Yvan Carr'e, Nick Lechtenborger et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Failing to See or Failing to Know? Attributing Errors in Vision-Language Models

A tree-structured framework is proposed that organizes failures in knowledge-intensive visual question answering into model-specific operational outcomes that support attribution-guided routing to targeted interventions, including image repair, entity support, question rewriting, and factual evidence.

K. Vo, Artem Vazhentsev, Artem Shelmanov et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Cross-Model Memory Transfer via Target-Side Reader Adaptation

The results suggest that Engram can serve as a reusable external knowledge artifact, provided that the target has access to a compatible reader interface and target-side adaptation can further improve alignment when direct reader reuse is insufficient.

Mingyuan Li, Guangsheng Yu, Xu Wang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.