It is found that fine-tuned AOs can become concept-specific anti-readers: they selectively fail to recover the concept persistently present during their own training, raising a reliability concern for learned interpretability interfaces.
Abstract
Activation Oracles (AOs) are language models trained to answer natural-language questions about another model's internal activations. They offer a flexible interface for reading hidden information from model states, especially when relevant information is internally represented but absent or incomplete in visible behavior. However, AOs are themselves learned systems: their answers are shaped by training data, objectives, and learned reporting behavior, rather than being neutral readouts of represented information. We study this in a controlled Taboo Word Guessing setting, where subject models are fine-tuned to internally use a hidden concept while avoiding direct disclosure. Contrary to the expectation that an AO trained on such a subject becomes a specialist reader, we find that fine-tuned AOs can become concept-specific anti-readers: they selectively fail to recover the concept persistently present during their own training. This failure is not simply explained by absence of the concept from the subject or oracle representations: the target remains decodable inside the oracle, while LogitLens and layer-ablation analyses indicate that the failure arises in the AO readout pathway. Our results show that behavioral leakage, representation-level decodability, and AO-verbalizability can come apart, raising a reliability concern for learned interpretability interfaces.
Two audit protocols, the comparison of grounding and truth and the swap to an independent evaluator, and RECAP (Readable Encodings via Co-trained Auxiliary Predictors), linear heads trained alongside the target model to keep designated content decodable are contributed.
The results show the inability of current open-weight models to introspect, but the debate is not settled for future models, as the debate is not settled for future models.
The results suggest that language models internally encode whether retrieved evidence is sufficient to support answering, and that this signal can be decoded reliably for RAG triage.
Syed Mahbubul Huq, Chris Child, Tillman Weyde et al.· 0 citations
The results demonstrate that suppressing entity-linked supervision during pretraining induces a shift in epistemic behavior: KLLMs rely less on parametric knowledge and more on external evidence, leading to improved reliability under realistic conditions, suggesting that pretraining-time control over knowledge acquisit...
Roi Cohen, Yvan Carr'e, Nick Lechtenborger et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
A tree-structured framework is proposed that organizes failures in knowledge-intensive visual question answering into model-specific operational outcomes that support attribution-guided routing to targeted interventions, including image repair, entity support, question rewriting, and factual evidence.
K. Vo, Artem Vazhentsev, Artem Shelmanov et al.· 0 citations
The results suggest that Engram can serve as a reusable external knowledge artifact, provided that the target has access to a compatible reader interface and target-side adaptation can further improve alignment when direct reader reuse is insufficient.
Mingyuan Li, Guangsheng Yu, Xu Wang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.