Experimental results of the FedAvg algorithm applied to the Human Activity Recognition domain show that, although FedAvg confirms a higher degree of personalization capabilities while keeping a high degree of generalization with respect to the traditional centralized learning, this result is not so obvious under stressful conditions, such as when varying class distribution over clients.
Abstract
The federated learning (FL) paradigm fosters distributed pervasive computing combined with artificial intelligence techniques, allowing for optimized data usage and improved mitigation of privacy concerns. Indeed, model training occurs on the client's local devices, and model parameters are subsequently shared with a centralized server. However, there is a need to find a tradeoff between models'personalization and generalization capabilities. In this paper, we design and implement several testing scenarios devoted to evaluating and comparing the centralized, local, and federated paradigm performances. We also design and implement a scenario that emulates a change in clients'data. We then present experimental results of the FedAvg algorithm applied to the Human Activity Recognition (HAR) domain to understand the trade-off between personalized and generalized accuracy. Results show that, although FedAvg confirms a higher degree of personalization capabilities while keeping a high degree of generalization with respect to the traditional centralized learning, this result is not so obvious under stressful conditions, such as when varying class distribution over clients.
Federated learning (FL) is a practical framework that can train models on distributed user data while guaranteeing data privacy; however, due to heterogeneity in which each user has a different data distribution, problems frequently arise where both global and personalization performance deteriorate simultaneously. Thi...
The fast growth of big data, along with the growing stricter privacy laws, poses tremendous challenges to the traditional centralized implementation of AI models. Federated Learning (FL) offers a decentralized solution; however, it is undermined by a number of performance limitations such as large communicational overh...
Shashi Purna Kurapathi· International Conference Com...· 0 citations
This study implemented a comprehensive experimental framework for analysing FL performance using standard FL aggregation protocols FedAvg, FedProx, and SCAFFOLD in conjunction with Differential Privacy mechanisms; specifically, the Gaussian noise mechanism with Rényi Differential Privacy (RDP) accountants.
Local Inference Guided Aggregation for Heterogeneous Training Environments to Yield Enhancement Through Agreement and Regularization (LIGHTYEAR), a federated learning framework that performs update selection in function space using an NTK-based agreement score to characterize predictive behavior and determine a persona...
Mirko Konstantin, S. Zachow, Anirban Mukhopadhyay· 0 citations
Nowadays, split federated learning (SFL) has emerged as an effective paradigm for enabling privacy-preserving collaborative intelligence across heterogeneous devices with limited computation. However, SFL incurs significant communication overhead in wireless networks due to the uplink transmission of high-dimensional s...
A review of federated learning through a structured taxonomy that covers its core architectural paradigms, major learning types, model training approaches, and aggregation mechanisms, and analyzes the principal challenges confronting FL, including privacy and security risks, statistical and system heterogeneity, commun...
Mahdiyeh Velaei, Hosna Ghahramani, Ali Ghaffari et al.· Cluster Computing· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.