The results suggest that LLMs can effectively bridge the gap between unstructured vulnerability reports and formal static analysis specifications, offering a scalable path toward comprehensive automated vulnerability detection.
Abstract
Static analysis remains a cornerstone of software security, yet the effectiveness of tools such as CodeQL is often limited by the substantial manual effort required to develop high-coverage query suites. While large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a potential solution for automated code reasoning, their practical utility in generating structured, executable security queries remains underexplored. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study to evaluate the ability of LLMs to synthesize CodeQL queries using vulnerability data from the National Vulnerability Database. Through this investigation, we explore the potential of using LLMs as an automatic CodeQL query generator. Subsequently, we systematically evaluate the performance of various LLM architectures across a diverse set of real-world vulnerabilities, measuring their ability to improve detection coverage and precision. Our findings reveal that LLM-generated queries significantly enhance the baseline CodeQL queries, yielding 82% improvement in average F1-score. Furthermore, we provide a detailed cost- benefit analysis showing that while direct LLM-based scanning of entire repositories is often computationally and financially prohibitive, leveraging LLMs to synthesize CodeQL queries offers a scalable and cost-effective alternative for large-scale vulnerability detection. Our results suggest that LLMs can effectively bridge the gap between unstructured vulnerability reports and formal static analysis specifications, offering a scalable path toward comprehensive automated vulnerability detection.
A security assessment on 75 FastAPI backends generated by three contemporary LLMs revealed a disconnect between functional correctness and secure logic, which is interpreted as a review-risk pattern, which is called the human-in-the-loop paradox.
Abdul Ali Khan, S. Rauti, T. Mäkilä· IEEE Access· 0 citations
Static application security testing (SAST) tools help developers find vulnerabilities before deployment, but false positives create substantial triage effort. We study whether CodeQL false positives in Java security analysis form recurring, explainable patterns that can be reduced by refining the analysis. We run CodeQ...
Findings indicate that ensembling approaches can be statistically significant and effective on larger datasets, where the best-performing ensemble improved performance by 37% over its individual LLMs on the commercial large-scale code.
M. Chochlov, Gul Aftab Ahmed, J. Patten et al.· ACM Transactions on Software...· 1 citation
SETYPE is presented, a semantics-aware type system that can be derived directly from source code based solely on the meanings of symbols and expressions in natural language that achieves 87% detection precision and 88% detection accuracy on real-world applications.
An automated security evaluation pipeline that generates Python code from LLMSecEval prompts, scans for vulnerabilities using CodeQL and Bandit in parallel with an independent Code Validator LLM, enriches the Code Validator findings with MITRE ATT&CK techniques, CWE Observed Examples, and Python best practice guideline...
Mikhail Surikov· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.