A student survey study is presented that examines perceptions of LLM output understanding, validation effort, trust and the perceived usefulness of vibe modeling across several AI-assisted development scenarios to inform future studies for trustworthy and explainable AI-based software engineering via vibe modeling.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate software artifacts from natural language prompts. While this enables rapid prototyping and lowers the barrier to software creation, it also introduces challenges related to understanding, validation, traceability, and trust. In this paper, we argue that current AI-based development practices focus too heavily on the direct generation of code and insufficiently on intermediate representations that preserve human intent and support reasoning about system behavior. We argue for vibe modeling as a lightweight intermediate abstraction between natural language interaction and code generation. To explore its potential, we present a student survey study that examines perceptions of LLM output understanding, validation effort, trust and the perceived usefulness of vibe modeling across several AI-assisted development scenarios. Our results are intended to inform future studies for trustworthy and explainable AI-based software engineering via vibe modeling.
This research aims to bridge the gap by providing a comprehensive evaluation methodology for LLM-powered agents that is grounded in real-world software development practice and focuses on contamination-awareness, in thewild agentic behavior assessment, and trajectory-aware benchmarks and metrics.
The growing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Software Engineering has reinforced the expectation that coding activities can be largely automated. However, this perception may represent yet another historical search for a solution capable of eliminating the inherent challenges of software development. This ar...
This study reframes generative AI not as an automation tool for analysis but as a collaborative partner for cognitive stimulation, and proposes PromptWeave, a prompt-design methodology intended to expand, deepen, and transform an analyst’s reasoning.
This paper introduces the notion of Hybrid Intelligence Effort (HIE), conceptualizing effort as the combined burden of model-performed reasoning and human oversight activities, and compares the explanatory power of traditional estimation metrics against interaction- and oversight-based Hybrid Intelligence dimensions.
Feisal Alaswad, E. Poovammal, Kadiyala Ramana et al.· Discover Computing· 1 citation· ⚡1
Six residual gaps in making the surrounding assurance reasoning sufficiently machine-operable are identified, a high-level architecture with six corresponding capabilities built on a shared semantic assurance layer is proposed, and four research questions are formulated to turn that architecture into dependable, human-...
Enterprise software requires specification governance to transform probabilistic AI generation into deterministic, auditable engineering, and the SGRM framework is introduced, which defines four-component specification contracts, constrains stochastic generation via deterministic validation, and integrates generation,...
Mamdouh Alenezi· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.