This study examines how quality assurance (QA) systems influence the emergence of different governance trajectories in Turkish higher education institutions. Rather than approaching QA only as a compliance or accreditation mechanism, the study treats it as a governance capability that shapes organizational coordination, institutional learning, strategic integration, evidence-based decision-making, and the functioning of the Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) cycle. The central argument is that institutions operating under the same centralized regulatory framework do not produce similar governance outcomes. Instead, institutional differences become visible through the degree to which QA practices are internalized, institutionalized, and incorporated into broader governance structures. The research is based on a qualitative longitudinal comparative design supported by document analysis. Institutional Self-Evaluation Reports (ISERs), Institutional Accreditation Reports (IARs), interim evaluation reports, strategic plans, and related governance documents produced between 2016 and 2024 within the Turkish higher education QA system were examined in order to trace institutional governance configurations over time. Four research universities—Hacettepe University, Sakarya University, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, and Dokuz Eylul University—were selected through purposive and theory-oriented sampling to capture different institutional trajectories. The findings indicate that universities exposed to the same QA framework may still follow substantially different governance paths. The study also suggests that accreditation outcomes are closely related to institutional context, organizational learning, and administrative integration. In this respect, the article contributes to higher education governance literature by interpreting QA not as a procedural endpoint, but as a long-term institutional capability-building process.
This study examines transparency and accountability in higher education financing through a comparative analysis of Indonesia and Uzbekistan. Using a qualitative documentary approach, the research draws on audited government financial reports, official ministerial accountability documents, and sustainability performanc...
Shokhjakhon Oybekov· Journal of Islamic Contempor...· 0 citations
This study examines the relationship between the institutionalization of the 2030 Agenda and educational quality assurance in Latin American public universities. Although the role of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in higher education has received growing scholarly attention, empirical evidence remains limited...
Carlos Núñez-Michuy, Diana Vásquez-Niama, D. Toledo-Días et al.· Sustainability· 0 citations
Saudi higher education is being reshaped by a policy environment that simultaneously expands institutional responsibility and intensifies evaluation, accreditation, performance monitoring, and alignment with national development priorities. This article examines how Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University (PSAU) discurs...
N. Alowayyid· Natural Resources for Human...· 0 citations
The transformation of Indonesian State Universities (PTN) into State University Private-Legal-Entities (PTNBH) represents a fundamental shift toward hybrid governance models that balance institutional autonomy with public accountability. Despite implementation across 24 institutions, systematic research examining organ...
Sofjan Aripin, Muhtarom· Humanities and Social Scienc...· 0 citations
Mission, vision, educational philosophy, and core values (MVPG) are important components of strategic governance in higher education institutions. However, many universities encounter challenges in translating these institutional commitments into governance practices. This study examines the MVPG operationalisation at...
Phuoc Son Le· Dong Thap University Journal...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.