Skip to content
#generative ai Open access

Epistemic reflexivity for AI-augmented research

Sep 2026 · Communications Psychology · Vol 4 · 0 citations · 5 references
Medicine

TL;DR

It is argued that researchers and institutions can position generative AI both as a tool for epistemic reflexivity and as an object that must be examined reflexively.

Abstract

Using generative AI in science necessitates that institutions and researchers practice epistemic reflexivity to protect intellectual diversity and resist the threat of scientific monoculture. We argue that researchers and institutions can position generative AI both as a tool for epistemic reflexivity and as an object that must be examined reflexively.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Conference Open access Aug 2026

GenAI and Epistemic Practices in Science Education: Opportunities and Didactic Challenges

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers opportunities for dialogic scaffolding, scientific reasoning, formative feedback, and instructional design, while raising cognitive, epistemic, didactic, and ethical risks. This review synthesized 34 publications from 2023 to 2026 that were identified through searches o...

Meryem Janati Idrissi, Omar Aarab, Elgadi Mabrouk et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

The epistemic debt of generative AI

Irene Unceta, Paula Subías-Beltrán, O. Pujol · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Out of My Other Mind

What would it take to convince us that an AI is conscious? Philosophers and scientists have debated the idea of consciousness for centuries, to no clear conclusion. The stakes of the argument have ramped up as AI accelerates. What are the defining characteristics of a conscious AI?

Jim Waldo · 0 citations
Case report 2026

Critical Thinking Tools for the Age of AI

This seminar explores practical tools for critical thinking in an information environment shaped by AI, scientific complexity, and persuasive misinformation to strengthen the epistemic quality of their research and scholarly writing.

L. Chindelevitch · 0 citations
Case report 2026

AI-Augmented Research

This workshop explores how AI can be used responsibly across the research lifecycle, from literature discovery and question development to computational analysis, writing, and publication and gives a practical framework for deciding what AI can assist with and what must remain human-led.

Moses Boudourides · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 30, 2026

Q&A: Hey AI, who should I vote for this year?

MIT professors Adam Berinsky and Chara Podimata discuss a new project to track how AI chatbots are responding to questions about the 2026 U.S. midterm elections.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 30, 2026

From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence

Evaluating Microsoft Copilot at enterprise scale requires test data that captures the full complexity of real organizations, yet real enterprise data contains sensitive information that cannot be used for evaluation under any circumstances. The post From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence appeared first on Microsoft Research.

GPT-Lab Oct 30, 2026

Black October? The Week AI Changed the Cybersecurity Conversation

Critical flaws, compromised release channels and agentic AI threats landed within days of each other in mid-October 2026. Why “Black October” may say more about how well we now find weaknesses than about the attacks themselves. The post Black October? The Week AI Changed the Cybersecurity Conversation appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.