Sparse Probing and Outcome-calibrated Targets OPD is introduced, which addresses two coupled decisions, where to probe and what to distill, through an acquisition--exploration--exploitation procedure and demonstrates the effectiveness of SPOT in improving reasoning performance while balancing solution quality and coverage.
Abstract
On-policy distillation (OPD) provides dense teacher supervision on student-generated trajectories, but standard reverse-KL training can assign insufficient probability to other plausible continuations. Teacher entropy alone does not reveal whether uncertainty is concentrated among a few plausible next tokens or dispersed over a long probability tail, nor whether the student already represents those candidates well. Moreover, local teacher probabilities may not predict downstream success. We introduce Sparse Probing and Outcome-calibrated Targets OPD (SPOT), which addresses two coupled decisions, where to probe and what to distill, through an acquisition--exploration--exploitation procedure. During acquisition, a position-level score combines normalized teacher entropy, the probability mass captured by a small top-$k$ candidate set, and student--teacher mismatch to allocate a limited probing budget. During exploration, SPOT evaluates teacher-proposed candidates through verifier-scored student continuations. During exploitation, these outcomes produce a closed-form, KL-regularized target that favors candidates with better downstream outcomes while remaining anchored to the teacher distribution. Extensive experiments across multiple student models and reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of SPOT in improving reasoning performance while balancing solution quality and coverage.
DiffGate is introduced, an outcome-gated objective that combines GRPO with selective, bounded teacher guidance, and improves pass@8 across all four model--domain settings, demonstrating improved solution coverage under the evaluation protocol.
Karn Tiwari, V. Chordia, P. PrathoshA· 0 citations
On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student model on self-generated trajectories, but transmitting dense teacher distributions across long reasoning traces creates prohibitive communication and memory bottlenecks. Practical systems therefore rely on sparse teacher interfaces, typically transmitting either the sampled...
Peng-Hui Yang, Long Xing, Xuan-Lang Dai et al.· 0 citations
This work identifies Teacher Uncertainty Contraction (TUC), a systematic phenomenon whereby the teacher's predictive uncertainty decreases as it continues from a student-generated prefix, and proposes Adaptive-Continuations On-Policy Distillation (AC-OPD), which augments informative states along student rollouts with t...
Jin-Gang Zhou, Yu-Yi Zhou, Hai-Yang Guo et al.· 3 citations
Reward-Aligned Reweighting for On-Policy Distillation (R$^{2}$-OPD), which uses outcome agreement and the magnitude of teacher--student disagreement to continuously reallocate teacher supervision, achieves the highest average accuracy among the compared training methods in both cross-size and same-size distillation.
Hao Xu, Junwei Su, Lan-Song Diao et al.· 0 citations
On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own generated prefixes with token-level teacher feedback, but transmitting or storing the teacher's full-vocabulary distribution at every token is costly. Entropy-aware OPD (EOPD) adds forward supervision to reverse KL to help the student recover plausible tokens it...
Zi-Xiang Ni, Zhuo-Lun Hu, Ren-Jie Cao et al.· 0 citations
Trajectory Dropout provides a simple mechanism for strengthening token-level supervision across model scales and OPD objectives and consistently improves average performance across teacher--student model pairs of different scales and six mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
Zi-Zhuo Lin, Quan-Ling Liu, Yi Yang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.