Skip to content

RAP: Research Attention Prediction Reveals Target-Conditioned Evidence Acquisition Biases

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 31 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Research Attention Prediction (RAP), a rolling benchmark covering 278 AI/ML fields and 1,390 episodes, is introduced, a rolling benchmark covering 278 AI/ML fields and 1,390 episodes for large language models to track shifts in research attention.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as research agents, yet their ability to track shifts in research attention is difficult to evaluate because reviews and research ideas lack uniquely verifiable outcomes. We introduce Research Attention Prediction (RAP), a rolling benchmark covering 278 AI/ML fields and 1,390 episodes. At each cut-off, an LLM agent searches a temporally restricted arXiv corpus and predicts the next six months'paper shares across eight frozen research directions. Search generally helps, but all four diagnostic models perform worse than an exact-count exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) baseline in compositional accuracy. We identify two linked bottlenecks. Under cumulative-history access, State carry-forward outperforms direct Forecast for all four diagnostic models; frozen-evidence replay links a shared component of this reversal to Forecast-oriented policies retrieving a smaller share of recent evidence. Even with exact historical activity, future-specific updating remains limited, with only GPT-5.5 plus reopened Search slightly surpassing EWMA. Fine-tuning on realised outcomes improves Qwen3-4B's forecast Spearman correlation by 0.105 on held-out fields at later origins, with gains also on change-rich episodes.

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Can Large Language Models Forecast What Researchers Study Next?

Threshold and judge diagnostics further clarify the limits of interpreting realization as precise anticipation and provides a common task for studying which research ideas a community subsequently pursues and how reliably this outcome can be measured.

Fenghai Li, Zi-Han Tang, Hao-Fei Yu et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Evidence Integration in Large Language Models

A distributional theory in which evidence shifts the receiver's distribution of initial answers, driven by a receiver prior weight and a candidate evidence tilt, leading to three predictions: candidates more probable to the receiver are more persuasive, receivers more readily integrate characteristic errors of their ow...

Sebastien Kawada, M. Kellis · 2 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Blackboard Intelligence Can Surpass Autoregressive on Globally Constrained Problems

This work studies blackboard intelligence: an inference-time perspective in which a model works on a fixed, revisable canvas and searches over candidate solution states rather than committing to a causal, left-to-right trajectory, and concludes that mean confidence, a simple model-internal quantity available from the s...

Woosang Jeon, Jaeyeon Kim, S. Kakade et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

When Low Prediction Error Misleads Planning: Diagnosing Representation, Dynamics, and Decision Failures in Latent World Models

The component that dominates a latent world model's prediction error need not be the one whose repair most improves action selection. We show this by comparing action sequences from identical physical starts and separating endpoint error into a candidate-pool center and action-relative responses. Across four model fami...

Rui Min, Xian-Yao Li, Fang Xu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.