Skip to content

CityPlanner: A Sandbox Agent for Executable Urban Planning

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 27 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

CityPlanner is proposed, a sandbox-agent framework for executable urban planning that consistently outperforms heuristic, task-specific RL, and general LLM-agent baselines and is verified on a real-world benchmark.

Abstract

Urban planning is a real-world spatial optimization problem that requires selecting feasible actions from large candidate spaces under practical objectives such as cost and service quality. Existing optimization and reinforcement learning methods are effective for fixed formulations, but often depend on task-specific representations and constraint handling. We propose \emph{CityPlanner}, a sandbox-agent framework for executable urban planning. CityPlanner introduces \emph{UrbanSandbox}, a unified file-based environment where agents inspect task files, generate plans, run evaluators, and revise decisions based on executable feedback. To make learning tractable, we further propose atomic-task reinforcement learning, which decomposes long sandbox trajectories into \emph{BuildPlan} for initial construction and \emph{ImprovePlan} for feedback-based refinement. Experiments on a real-world benchmark show that CityPlanner consistently outperforms heuristic, task-specific RL, and general LLM-agent baselines. Ablations verify the contributions of UrbanSandbox, atomic-task RL, and iterative deployment. We release the code and dataset at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/co-agent-C1C8

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Agentic Urban Planning Assistant: A Parametric Approach to Spatial and Regulatory Evaluation in Urban Planning

Urban planning decision support often requires a joint interpretation of legal rules, parcel geometry, zoning parameters, street context, and proposal-specific constraints. Generic retrieval-augmented generation is insufficient for this setting since many answers depend on structured spatial evidence and deterministic...

E. Hristov, A. Spasov, Denis Dimitrov et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access 2026

LLM-enhanced Dynamic Fleet Planning with Hierarchical Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning Framework

The proposed hierarchical multi-agent proximal policy optimization framework can reduce total airlines' operational costs—including direct operating cost and capital cost and achieves a computation speedup in comparison with a conventional optimization baseline.

Li-Jing Liu, James M. Shihua, Qi-Yu Yan et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

NeuralParker: A Reinforcement Learning Planner for Irregular Parking Environments

This work presents NeuralParker, a reinforcement learning-based hybrid planner for arbitrary-pose parking that encodes full-environment obstacle and boundary geometry in a target-relative vertex representation, allowing the policy to retain route-defining context throughout the approach.

Zihan Wang, Baixiang Huang, Yang Guan et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Shared-Roadmap Generation and Evaluator for Multi-Agent Path Planning Using Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network

Multi-agent path planning (MAPP) in continuous environments often relies on roadmaps to balance safety and search efficiency. However, traditional roadmap generation methods, such as lattice grids or standard sampling-based approaches, frequently face a trade-off between graph density and the likelihood of finding feas...

Brandon Ho, Nikola Rogers, Seung-Kyum Choi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2024

LSTP-Nav: Lightweight Spatiotemporal Policy for Map-Free Multi-Agent Navigation With LiDAR

This paper proposes LSTP-Nav, a lightweight, decentralized navigation framework built on LSTP-Net that maps stacked 2D LiDAR observations, goal information, and velocity feedback directly to action and introduces an HS reward to provide smooth, heading-aware safety feedback, and develops PhysReplay-SimLab to improve tr...

Xingrong Diao, Zhi-Qiang Sun, Jian-Wei Peng et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

LeanPlan: Optimal Planning with LLM-Generated Heuristics and Admissibility Proofs

Frontier large language models (LLMs) can generate heuristic functions that guide search to achieve state-of-the-art performance in satisficing planning, where any plan is acceptable. However, these heuristics are not guaranteed to be admissible and can lead to suboptimal plans. We introduce LeanPlan, the first plannin...

A. G. Pereira, Augusto B. Corrêa, Felipe Meneguzzi et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.