Skip to content

Optimizing Crop Disease Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Transfer Learning Architectures for Precision Agriculture

2026 · Journal of Machine Learning Innovations and Artificial Intelligence Horizons · Vol 01, pp. 58-74 · 0 citations

TL;DR

This research contributes a systematic evaluation of transfer learning architectures for precision agriculture, demonstrating that pretrained models can effectively reduce computational complexity while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy.

Abstract

Crop diseases pose a substantial threat to global food security, yet existing detection methods often suffer from delays and labor-intensive processes. We present a comparative analysis of four transfer learning architectures—VGG16, ResNet50, MobileNetV2, and EfficientNetB0—for automated crop disease classification from leaf images. Our framework leverages a supervised deep learning approach trained on approximately 54,000 labeled images from six crop species (tomato, potato, maize, pepper, grapes, and apple) sourced from the PlantVillage database, covering seven major disease categories. All images were preprocessed to 224×224 pixels and augmented with rotation, flipping, zoom, and brightness adjustments. We employed a consistent architecture comprising a pretrained CNN feature extractor, global average pooling, a fully connected dense layer, and a softmax classifier. The Adam optimizer with a learning rate of 0.001 and categorical cross-entropy loss were used over 50 epochs with a batch size of 32. The dataset was split into 70% training, 15% validation, and 15% testing. Among all models, EfficientNetB0 achieved the highest accuracy of 97.3%, with precision, recall, and F1-score of 97.0%, 97.1%, and 97.0% respectively. ResNet50 attained 95.4% accuracy, MobileNetV2 reached 94.1%, and VGG16 yielded 93.2%. Confusion matrix analysis revealed minor misclassifications primarily among visually similar fungal diseases. Training curves demonstrated stable convergence with minimal overfitting. The superior performance of EfficientNetB0 highlights its suitability for real-time agricultural monitoring. This research contributes a systematic evaluation of transfer learning architectures for precision agriculture, demonstrating that pretrained models can effectively reduce computational complexity while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Tomato Leaf Disease Classification Using Proposed AlexNet: A Deep Learning Approach for Sustainable Agriculture

A modified AlexNet architecture for classifying field-captured tomato leaf images into seven disease categories was developed and generally focused on symptom-bearing leaf regions, whereas target spot was the most difficult category to classify.

Debabrat Bharali, Kanak C. Bora, Rashel Sarkar et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A Compact Deep Learning Framework for Potato Leaf Disease Classification Across Controlled/Uncontrolled Environments

Potato leaf disease poses a significant threat to global food security, causing substantial crop losses that jeopardise agricultural productivity and farmers’ livelihoods worldwide. Existing automated detection frameworks suffer from several persistent limitations, including over-reliance on controlled benchmark datase...

O. Attallah · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Explainable Transfer Learning for Multi-Crop Plant Disease Identification Under Real-Field Conditions

Two deep learning models, a custom CNN model and a transfer learning model based on the DenseNet-121 architecture are presented, showing that the developed transfer learning model based on DenseNet-121 had superior performance over the CNN model.

H. Jeiad, S. Samaan, Omar Janeh et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

HYBRID DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR AUTOMATED PLANT DISEASE CLASSIFICATION

An extensive set of experiments was conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed model for plant disease detection, and it is demonstrated that the model achieves highly reliable results, with an accuracy of 97.13%.

Hayat Meddeber, M. Meddeber · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.