Aug 2026· Journal of the American Heart Association : Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease· pp.
e050411
· 0 citations· 21 references
Medicine
TL;DR
LACI ≥36%, particularly measured via CMR, shows strong diagnostic potential for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as a noninvasive adjunct to current diagnostic strategies.
Abstract
Background
Right heart catheterization is the gold standard for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction but is invasive and not readily accessible. The left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI), defined as the ratio of left atrial minimal volume to left ventricular end-diastolic volume, has been proposed as a surrogate of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. This study compares 3 imaging modalities for LACI assessment and evaluates diagnostic performance for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Methods
We retrospectively included 1680 patients from 2 academic hospitals (Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands, and ASPIRE registry). All underwent diagnostic right heart catheterization and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR); a subset additionally underwent cardiac computed tomography, and/or echocardiography. Patients were divided into derivation and validation cohorts. left atrial and left ventricular volumes were measured at end-diastole. Agreement between imaging modalities was evaluated with Bland-Altman plots. The predictive performance of LACI for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, with cut-off values derived in the derivation cohort and tested unchanged in the validation cohort.
Results
Assessment of LACI measurement accuracy across imaging modalities showed strong agreement between CMR and echocardiography. CMR LACI outperformed echocardiography (area-under-the-curve=0.84 versus 0.65), while cardiac computed tomography tended to overestimate LACI. The derivation cohort identified LACI ≥36% on CMR as the optimal threshold (sensitivity: 64%, specificity: 83%), which was tested in the validation cohort (sensitivity: 58%, specificity: 82%).
Conclusions
LACI ≥36%, particularly measured via CMR, shows strong diagnostic potential for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as a noninvasive adjunct to current diagnostic strategies.
Abstarct Background Risk stratification in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) traditionally relies on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), which may not fully demonstrate the complex interplay between atrium and ventricle. The left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) has emerged as a promising integrative marker. T...
S. Treewatchareekorn, S. Titichoatrattana, P. Kosum et al.· International Journal of Car...· 0 citations
Background Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging because clinical findings may not reflect hemodynamic disease expression. Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LEDA (Left ventricular concentricity, E/e′, left ventricle-to-left at...
P. Palka, R. Hilling-Smith, B. Bell et al.· JACC: Advances· 0 citations
CMR-derived LACI is an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, particularly HFH, in patients with ICM, and provides incremental prognostic value beyond traditional metrics like LVEF.
LASI is a resting echocardiographic marker associated with positive DST and may help refine pre-test selection for DST among patients with suspected HFpEF, particularly those with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores.
Minkwan Kim, J. Seo, S. Bae et al.· Journal of the American Soci...· 0 citations
Both LACI and LASI demonstrate good diagnostic value for LVDD in patients with CKD, with LASI showing superior performance and the combined use of both parameters significantly improves diagnostic sensitivity.
Xiaobo Chen, Yuanli Wang, Yong-Quan Huang et al.· Journal of the American Soci...· 0 citations
In obese HFpEF patients, LA strain is associated with NT-proBNP levels, while atrial stiffness is associated with NT-proBNP and functional capacity, and these parameters provide complementary information on hemodynamic burden and clinical status.
G. Mandoli, M. Lambardi, A. Capolongo et al.· International Journal of Car...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.