Skip to content
Open access

Algorithm-driven Development: A proactive approach to improving software quality and reducing defects

Aug 2026 · Journal of Systems and Software · 0 citations · 57 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Algorithm-Driven Development is introduced, a methodology developed from industrial practice to address recurring challenges in translating requirements into reliable, testable, and maintainable software behavior that provides systematic coverage of functional scenarios from the outset of development.

Abstract

Ensuring software quality while meeting deadlines and adapting to evolving requirements is a persistent challenge in software engineering practice. This paper introduces Algorithm-Driven Development (ADD), a methodology developed from industrial practice to address recurring challenges in translating requirements into reliable, testable, and maintainable software behavior. ADD translates requirements into algorithmic flowcharts from which acceptance tests are systematically derived. These flowcharts serve both as specification artifacts and as technical blueprints, supporting shared understanding between stakeholders and developers. By linking requirement modeling with automated test generation, ADD provides systematic coverage of functional scenarios, including edge cases, from the outset of development. The approach was evaluated over a four-year period within an industrial project at Dassault Syst\`emes, involving two development teams, 22,444 lines of production code for Team 1, and 157 APIs analyzed for Team 2. The evaluation combined longitudinal quality and delivery indicators with a comparative analysis of ADD, TDD, and test-last development practices across API functions of different complexity levels. Empirical data collected from internal lifecycle management and CI/CD systems show that ADD supported sustained code coverage above 95%, low defect density in both QA and post-release phases, and a stable delivery cadence. These findings provide evidence of ADD's potential to strengthen the connection between requirements, testing, and implementation in industrial software development contexts.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2022

Test-Driven Development and Behaviour-Driven Development: An Integrated Framework for Enterprise Software Quality Assurance

An integrated reference architecture is proposed that combines TDD's fine-grained unit-level feedback loop with BDD's stakeholder-readable acceptance criteria inside a single continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline.

Urvish Gajjar · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

From Metrics to Improvement: A Lifecycle-Aware LLM Feedback Framework for Research Software Quality

A lifecycle-aware framework that integrates quantitative software quality assessment with Large Language Model (LLM)-based code refinement is proposed and the potential of metric-driven LLM feedback for research software quality improvement is demonstrated while highlighting its inherently multi-objective nature.

Nafis Tanveer Islam, N. Soveizi, Yutong Li et al. · 0 citations

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES BASED ON DEVOPS

A guide that facilitates the step-by-step adoption of five practices: version control, change requests controlled with manual code inspection, continuous integration, static code analysis, and implementing an automated pipeline for continuous integration is proposed.

M. Pastrana, Hugo-Armando Ordoñez-Erazo, C. Cobos-Lozada et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Requirements Engineering Challenges and Solutions in Open‐Source Software Development

This research aims to identify and validate key challenges and their solutions within the RE process for open‐source software development (OSSD) and propose best practices to address these challenges.

Fazli Rabi, M. Ilyas, Nasir Rashid et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Jul 2026

Evaluating Explanatory Artefacts of DSAR-Recovered Software Architectures from Industrial Codebases

An empirical assessment indicating that DSAR supports comprehension, architectural reasoning, and communication; qualitative evidence on the strengths and limitations of the generated explanatory artefacts; and recommendations for practitioners and researchers on adopting and further developing DSAR for architectural s...

S. A. Rukmono, Lina Ochoa, Thijs Bressers et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.