Skip to content

The roles of selective attention, working memory, and age in bilateral speech interference for single-sided deafness cochlear-implant users

Aug 2026 · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · Vol 159, pp. A107-A107 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Bilateral speech interference was significantly associated with older age and poorer selective attention, while better working memory was significantly associated with improved performance overall and points to possible clinical applications including selective-attention training or pre-operative screening for risk of interference.

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) for single-sided deafness (SSD) can partially restore the ability to use binaural interactions to improve masked speech intelligibility. When target and masking speech are presented to the acoustic-hearing (AH) ear, presenting a copy of the masker to the CI ear facilitates spatial release from masking (SRM) and improves speech perception. The reverse is not true, however; presenting a copy of the masker to the AH ear can impede CI-ear speech perception. This “bilateral speech interference” varies greatly across listeners and understanding the source of this variability is crucial to maximizing SRM. Bilateral speech interference was assessed in 19 SSD-CI listeners (ages 20–77 years) using the coordinate response measure corpus. Participants also completed two non-auditory selective-attention tasks (Stroop, Flanker) and a working memory task (Reading Span). Bilateral speech interference was significantly associated with older age and poorer selective attention, while better working memory was significantly associated with improved performance overall. The role of domain-general selective attention points to possible clinical applications including selective-attention training or pre-operative screening for risk of interference. [The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of War or U.S. Government.]

View source

Similar papers

Oct 2026

Auditory- and Visual-Speech Evoked Activation of the Superior Temporal Gyrus Contralateral to the Cochlear Implant Predicts Speech Recognition Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES Speech recognition outcomes vary widely in cochlear implant recipients, but the reasons for this variability are not well explained by patient history factors alone. Neuroplastic reorganization after both deafness and cochlear implant switch-on can affect how new recipients adapt to electrical hearing. In th...

Tommy Peng, K. Henshall, J. Esmaelpoor et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

The Effect of Between-Ear Speech Perception Asymmetry on Localization, Spoken Language, and Literacy for Adolescents With Cochlear Implants.

PURPOSE This study aimed to examine the effects of between-ear speech perception asymmetry on localization, spoken language, and reading in adolescents with early cochlear implants (CIs). METHOD Eighty adolescents, who have long-term bilateral device use, participated: 10 with bimodal (BM) devices (CI plus hearing ai...

Lisa Davidson, R. Uchanski, A. Geers et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Distinct Roles of Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Speech-in-Noise Perception

Difficulty perceiving speech in noise is the primary complaint of patients seeking hearing healthcare, even absent overt losses in audiometric thresholds. Yet current clinical practice largely focuses on sensory function while ignoring the potentially outsized effects of executive function on everyday suprathreshold li...

Sharadhi Bharadwaj, Catherine Dymowski, Erin Batik et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Residual Low-to-Mid Frequency Hearing in the Poorer-Hearing Ear Is Associated with Better Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deafness.

Preserved low-to-mid frequency hearing in the poorer-hearing ear was associated with better localization in patients with SSD when the stimulus contained rich spatial cues, such as broadband noise.

Seungik Jeon, Hyo-Jeong Lee · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Comparing sound localization and speech-in-noise in unilateral, bilateral, single-sided deaf, and bimodal cochlear implant users.

Cochlear implant users do not experience spatial hearing with the same accuracy or acuity as typical hearing listeners. Two standard measures of spatial hearing are sound localization error and speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in spatially separated noise. While sound localization requires a complicated setup, SRTs m...

Stephen R. Dennison, Jenna Felder, Caroline K. Paroby et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Microphone directionality improves speech perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users

Speech understanding in noise remains challenging for cochlear implant (CI) users. To address this, microphone directionality has been integrated into speech processors to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Despite demonstrated benefits for users of non-tonal language, studies investigating its efficacy for users o...

Bei-Er Qi, Rui-Juan Dong, Xin Gu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.