Simulations and a US linked birth/infant-death application illustrate the gap between a model that is merely estimable and one whose decisions are certifiable: the whole-population rule stopped while more than half of referral-relevant profiles remained ambiguous, whereas the decision-targeted rule did not certify by the 300{,}000-birth horizon despite stable temporal validation.
Abstract
Rare clinical outcomes pose a difficulty deeper than ordinary class imbalance: a penalized logistic model can return finite, stable-looking coefficients before the data support a reliable threshold decision. We formulate the accrual question as decision-targeted sequential certification. On a prespecified finite monitoring schedule and target set, asymptotic prediction bands are adjusted for simultaneous coverage, and certification is assessed only among profiles that might be referred, so that a large low-risk majority cannot trigger an uninformative stop. Under the working rare-event logistic model and stated regularity conditions, each certified decision is asymptotically model-conditionally correct with probability at least \(1-\alpha\) over the schedule, and the effective information scales with the number of genuine events. Simulations and a US linked birth/infant-death application illustrate the gap between a model that is merely estimable and one whose decisions are certifiable: the whole-population rule stopped while more than half of referral-relevant profiles remained ambiguous, whereas the decision-targeted rule did not certify by the 300{,}000-birth horizon despite stable temporal validation. Regularization makes a rare-event model estimable but does not substitute for genuine rare-event information.
We compare two locked survival prediction models in a target population before target survival outcomes are available. At a prespecified horizon, the estimand is the target Brier-risk contrast. Under a bounded conditional log-odds shift model on a prespecified deployment summary, we derive a sharp identified set preser...
Survival-rule induction is commonly guided by log-rank separation, whereas some prognostic questions target conditional future lifetime. We propose a directional finite-horizon mean residual life (MRL) criterion for survival-rule induction under right censoring, combining normalized subgroup support with a survival-wei...
Efficient adaptive inference reduces computational demands, but selecting among policies on the same calibration data without controlling errors simultaneously can compromise safety conclusions. Practical deployment also requires explicit reporting of infeasibility, conditional efficiency analysis, and certification ac...
Sooyoung Jang, Siyeon Park, Sungpil Woo et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
SOWRC combines alert labels with randomized audits through Horvitz–Thompson losses and a martingale-mixture boundary and shows that population risk is non-identifiable when any silent region has zero labeling probability.
Si-Yang Bai, Zheng Fang, Jie Chen· Axioms· 0 citations
Selective prediction requires a statistically reliable rule for deciding which model outputs can be returned while controlling the error rate among accepted predictions. In large language model (LLM) applications, uncertainty scores provide useful ranking information, but directly thresholding such scores does not yiel...
Cros, a risk-constrained stopping layer combining state-wise error ranking, policy design on disjoint development splits, and LTT-style exact tests of selective diagnostic error and minimum autonomous coverage for complete sequential policies, is presented.
Yue-Xin Wu, V. Rus· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.