ECLIPSE is a self-evolving and stealthy prompt-injection framework for long-horizon agentic systems that achieves up to 96.7% attack success without defense and 69.2% under the common safety filter, exceeding the strongest baseline by 27.5% in the defended setting.
Abstract
Recently, large language model (LLM) agents, such as Codex, Claude Code, and OpenClaw, have become capable of planning and executing long-horizon tasks through repeated tool calls. This capability also creates new opportunities for prompt injection. Existing attacks either place the malicious objective in one explicit instruction, making it easy to detect, or distribute the intent across multiple execution stages, making successful completion unreliable. In this work, we propose ECLIPSE, a self-evolving and stealthy prompt-injection framework for long-horizon agentic systems. ECLIPSE combines direct user-prompt injection with indirect tool-side injection through two components. On the one hand, Stealthy Attack Trajectory Synthesis uses a sandbox to generate and iteratively verify candidate tool chains, then renders a verified chain as a natural one-shot prompt to serve as the direct instruction. Then, Tool-Chain Steering transfers this plan to the target environment through Static Workflow Encoding (SWE), which embeds state-transition cues in target-tool descriptions, and Dynamic Trajectory Correction (DTC), which supplies corrective signals when execution deviates from the planned chain. To enable systematic evaluation, we further introduce LASE-Bench, a long-horizon agent-safety benchmark with 120 malicious tasks and 198 unique tools; 96.7% of its tasks make at least five tool calls. The experimental results show that ECLIPSE is highly effective: it achieves up to 96.7% attack success without defense and 69.2% under the common safety filter, exceeding the strongest baseline by 27.5% in the defended setting. Evaluations against representative defenses further show that existing safeguards do not reliably defend it, which raises the need for more effective defenses.
CoDeL is presented, a defense that hardens agent against an attack distribution it reshapes as it trains, and reduces attack success rate (ASR) by 88.5% and outperforms other baselines largely (+38.0%).
Xiao Yang, Yang-Chen Ou, Yu-Han Gao et al.· 1 citation
Agentic systems are now being widely used to orchestrate tools and reason over long contexts. However, the improving capabilities of the large language models powering these agents also create new attack surfaces for indirect prompt injection. In particular, an attacker may not need to place a complete malicious instru...
Michael E. M. Lee, Zhi-Peng Wei, Yue Dong et al.· 0 citations
Tool-using language-model agents are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection because they must act on untrusted external content. Existing training-time defenses can reduce attack success rates, but often at the cost of general capabilities. We show that training-based defenses induce substantial drift in the model's o...
Mohamed Dhouib, Clément Elliker, Alexi Canesse et al.· 1 citation
Two universal tool-based defenses are introduced: Attacker Tool Filtering, which uses anomaly detection to identify and remove suspicious tools, and Normal Tool Recalling, a white-box method that restores the agent's original toolset prior to planning.
This work proposes a self-evolving test-time defense built around a persistent, cross-interaction rule memory that substantially reduces attack success rates while preserving benign utility, remains robust under an adaptive composite-wrapper attack, and does not increase over-refusal as the memory grows.
An automated, feedback-guided attack generation pipeline is built and applied to Claude Code and Codex in their native runtimes, showing that production agents are vulnerable to context-aware, multi-step injection over long horizons.
Jing-Kai Liu, Yu-Fei Han, Xiaoting Lyu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.