OpenMLE is introduced, an open full-stack system for RSI research in MLE, spanning verifiable task environments with execution feedback, operator learning, and long-horizon search (OpenMLE-Evo) and enabling reproducible research on executable AI4AI toward RSI.
Abstract
Recursive self-improvement (RSI) requires AI systems that improve the process of building AI (i.e., AI4AI); machine learning engineering (MLE) offers a concrete, executable testbed for studying this capability. We introduce OpenMLE, an open full-stack system for RSI research in MLE, spanning verifiable task environments with execution feedback (OpenMLE-Gym), operator learning (OpenMLE-RL), and long-horizon search (OpenMLE-Evo). On this stack we post-train Frontis-MA1 (35B) as a meta-evolution agent for MLE, aligning post-training and inference around four atomic program-evolution operators (Draft, Improve, Debug, Crossover): the same operators are trained via execution-grounded SFT and RL on data deduplicated against all evaluation benchmarks, then composed into long-horizon search, coupling learning and evolution in a single loop. On MLE-Bench Lite under a 12-hour per-task budget on one RTX 4090 capped at 12 GB VRAM, Frontis-MA1 (35B) improves Medal Average from 39.39% to 60.61% over its base model with OpenMLE-Evo, and reaches 71.21% with OpenMLE-Evo-Max (benchmark-independent experience priors and asynchronous search), exceeding GPT-5.5 + Codex and approaching GPT-5.6 Sol and the 2.8T Kimi K3. On held-out NatureBench Lite, both components transfer: with the framework fixed, swapping in the trained model raises Match-SOTA from 50% to 70%; with the model fixed, swapping in OpenMLE-Evo raises it from 20% to 50%. We release the model weights and the full OpenMLE stack to enable reproducible research on executable AI4AI toward RSI. Code: https://github.com/FrontisAI/OpenRSI
As claims about recursive self-improvement (RSI) and artificial general intelligence (AGI) proliferate, we ask a simple question: do frontier AI models have a sense of data, i.e., can they reliably select the right data for training? We introduce DataSense-Bench to study this capability through the fundamental problem...
Yudi Zhang, Ming-Yu Cao, Lu Yin et al.· 0 citations
Results characterize when runtime-controlled composition of coding-agent products improves execution accuracy, as well as when runtime-controlled composition of coding-agent products improves execution accuracy.
Zheng-Yu Chen, Lin-Feng Liu, Hong Li et al.· 0 citations
This work presents AI4AI\mbox{-}Bench, 10 frozen research repositories spanning 10 training algorithm families, and releases the task suite, the evaluators and every scored submission, so that the measurement can be repeated as these systems change.
Yi-Zhe Chi, Wen-Yi Li, De-Yao Hong et al.· 11 citations· ⚡3
Across several reasoning tasks and model families, the proposed frontier learning approach consistently achieves higher relative gains over fixed-pool baselines, demonstrating that effective post-training requires not only selecting useful problems, but continually generating them at the edge of capability.
Robin Faro, S. Ramesh, Ilija Bogunovic et al.· 0 citations
On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) of large language models (LLMs) has demonstrated the ability to improve reasoning capabilities while preserving previously acquired knowledge. Despite substantial empirical success, the dynamics of OPSD in continual reasoning remain incompletely understood. Modeling LLM reasoning as s...
As large language models become more powerful, self-evolving agents are able to tackle challenging tasks including AI for machine learning (AI4ML). In AI4ML, while empirical verification is available, it often requires computationally costly model training and evaluation, limiting the speed and scale of agent evolution...
Jiamu Bai, Li-Zhu Zhang, Xin Yu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.