A dual-assessment framework is introduced that scores any real-time gaze transformation on two axes at once: interaction utility, measured through an offline gaze-interaction simulation and an operational spatial-accuracy metric, and privacy preservation, measured through the Rank-1 Identification Rate of a state-of-the-art re-identification adversary.
Abstract
Gaze-based interaction is emerging as a standard input modality on consumer extended-reality (XR) devices. Yet each gaze input constitutes an involuntary biometric disclosure, as the same signal that selects a button can also identify the user who produced it. Reducing identity information without degrading interaction is difficult: most prior methods are validated on small datasets or optimized for only one of the two competing objectives. We introduce a dual-assessment framework that scores any real-time gaze transformation on two axes at once: interaction utility, measured through an offline gaze-interaction simulation and an operational spatial-accuracy metric, and privacy preservation, measured through the Rank-1 Identification Rate (IR) of a state-of-the-art re-identification adversary. We test the framework on 23 conditions: one raw baseline and 22 privacy variants from eight lightweight signal-processing families using two publicly available datasets (GazeBase and GazeBaseVR). Deterministic operators produce no significant change in identity on either dataset, because a subject-invariant mapping preserves the relative geometry a biometric embedding exploits. Identity drops sharply only when identity-uncorrelated randomness is injected per sample. Smoothing applied afterwards to recover signal quality partially restores identifiability on both datasets. The best-balanced configuration reduces the Rank-1 IR by 64.3 percentage points on GazeBase and 67.9 points on GazeBaseVR, while leaving target-selection success essentially unchanged on both datasets. Privacy-preserving gaze interaction is therefore not zero-sum. However, the reduction in identifiability is achieved by injecting randomness rather than by improving signal fidelity.
This work studies whether gaze data representation choice can serve as a lightweight privacy control at feature extraction, before adding perturbation or formal privacy mechanisms, and compares three gaze representations under matched model capacity.
Cory Ilo, Brendan John, Doug A. Bowman· 0 citations
Formal guarantees which bound how reliably an attacker can accurately identify the user's saccades (rapid eye movements) that leak information about the user's status are presented; and this bound is linked to the level of noise injected by a sample-level Gaussian noise privacy mechanism.
Miguel Angel Lopez, Anish S. Narkar, J. Michalak et al.· Proceedings of the Second Wo...· 0 citations
Eye movement biometrics (EMB) is an emerging behavioral modality for user authentication, particularly in virtual- and augmented-reality systems, where gaze dynamics contain distinctive subject-specific features. However, robust EMB systems require diverse, high-quality gaze recordings that are expensive to collect and...
Kamrul Hasan, Mehedi Hasan Raju, Oleg V. Komogortsev· 1 citation
Eye gaze is the fastest natural pointing signal available to interactive systems, but for three decades accurate gaze interaction has remained tied to dedicated infrared eyetracking hardware. The convergence of deep appearance-based gaze estimation, ubiquitous front-facing cameras, and on-device neural inference has op...
Zia Rasheed, Darda Rahman, Mehmoona Akram· Global Journal of Engineerin...· 0 citations
AI glasses are emerging as one of the fastest-growing categories in consumer wearables, embedding always-on cameras, microphones, and cloud-connected multimodal assistants. Yet these same sensors can continuously capture audio, video, and biometric signals from both wearers and nearby people, routing much of that data...
Mohammed Aldeen, Jing-Wen Yan, Zi-Xun Xiong et al.· Proceedings of the Second Wo...· 0 citations
Lensless near-eye sensing is often described as privacy-friendly because its coded measurements are visually unintelligible. Yet visual unintelligibility reflects human interpretation, not what a learned adversary can recover. We therefore treat identity privacy as a systems property of disclosure surfaces: representat...
Critical flaws, compromised release channels and agentic AI threats landed within days of each other in mid-October 2026. Why “Black October” may say more about how well we now find weaknesses than about the attacks themselves. The post Black October? The Week AI Changed the Cybersecurity Conversation appeared first on GPT-Lab.
Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
During the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences’ 75th Anniversary Symposium, President Sally Kornbluth said “MIT has never needed your particular insight and guidance more than we do now.”
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.