Clean Accuracy Does Not Guarantee Provenance Robustness: A Prospective Codec-Stress Evaluation of Audio Attribution

Abstract

Audio provenance attribution - which system produced a synthetic utterance - is reported at near-ceiling accuracy on clean benchmarks, yet audio reaching an analyst has usually been transcoded. We report a prospectively registered measurement of closed-set attribution after single-stage codec transport, with the analysis region fixed from fidelity metadata before any attribution model was trained. On two corpora, in-support losses reach 53.5 [43.5, 63.6] and 70.3 [63.0, 77.5] Macro-F1 points for WavLM-Base+, and 61.0 [56.8, 65.1] and 49.8 [41.6, 57.9] for W2V2-BERT 2.0, under simultaneous component-level bands. Degradation is strongly condition- and representation-dependent: within one in-support grid WavLM losses run from -0.4 to +53.5 points, and the two encoders differ beyond a prespecified +/-5-point margin at six of twelve conditions. A clean-qualified ECAPA-TDNN and a Proxy-Anchor head degrade comparably, so the effect is not confined to one representation family or a weak linear head. The registered matched-fidelity comparison was not estimable on this grid, and waveform and perceptual measures order the conditions differently: MP3 at 8 kbit/s ranks mid-grid on SI-SDR but last on PESQ-WB while causing the largest loss. For the tested tasks, corpora, representations and codec grid, a clean accuracy figure does not by itself characterise deployment robustness.