Jul 2026· American Journal of Health Promotion· pp.
8901171261468529
· 0 citations· 33 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Individuals with a history of preventive care, such as attending at least one non-emergency medical visit in the past year, receiving either the pneumococcal or influenza vaccine within the past year, strongly predicted COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.
Abstract
PurposeCOVID-19 devastated communities globally, with the United States leading in fatalities despite extensive control efforts. In 2021, COVID-19 vaccines emerged as the most promising solution, with an efficacy rate exceeding 95% after full vaccination. However, herd immunity remains an elusive target with only 70% of the U.S. population fully vaccinated. This study investigates whether prior vaccination and medical history significantly predict COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake.DesignUsing data collected from the 66th largest U.S. city after the widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines and boosters, we employed logistic regression to test whether an individual's history of vaccination and prior medical engagement positively influence COVID-19 vaccine-related decisions.SettingCross-sectional U.S. survey from July-October 2022 (N = 397) and November 2023-February 2024 (N = 429).SubjectsAdult Residents of the City of Newark, New Jersey (Aged 18+).MeasuresNewark Community Health Survey (2022, 2023).ResultsIndividuals with a history of preventive care, such as attending at least one non-emergency medical visit in the past year, receiving either the pneumococcal or influenza vaccine within the past year, strongly predicted COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. These predictors also demonstrated a strong positive association with the completion of the primary vaccine series and a higher overall total vaccine uptake.ConclusionFuture vaccine campaigns should prioritize "low engagement" populations who lack both recent routine medical visits and a history of previous vaccinations.
It was found that only 53.1% of respondents reported intending to be vaccinated in a future pandemic—a marked decline from observed COVID-19 vaccination coverage, and vaccination intention was lower among adults aged 20–40 years, women, individuals with lower income or educational attainment, and those endorsing misinf...
J. Kawasaki, Masakaze Hamada, Masaki Machida et al.· npj Vaccines· 0 citations
This Swedish population study reveals that healthy vaccinee bias inflates estimates of the effectiveness of updated COVID-19 vaccines in adults aged 65 years or older, highlighting the need to account for frailty and overall health status.
Johan Lyth, A. Spreco, J. Hinkula et al.· Nature Communications· 0 citations
It is shown that vaccine effectiveness against infection and severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 remained consistent across matching strategies, despite differences in non-COVID-19 mortality, highlighting the importance of using specific outcomes in vaccine effectiveness studies.
H. Chemaitelly, H. Ayoub, Peter V. Coyle et al.· Communications Health· 0 citations
The need for stronger, sustainably financed adult immunization platforms and associated monitoring systems to enhance life-course vaccination benefits and to support future outbreak, epidemic, and pandemic responses is underscored.
D. Brooks, A. Germann, L. Craw et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
The apparent link between vaccine category and coverage largely reflected differences in economic capacity, geographic region, and deployment context rather than vaccine category itself.
W. Al-Zyoud, D. Erekat, Mohammad Abudayah· PLOS Global Public Health· 0 citations
The findings highlight that adolescent vaccination impact depends on the timing/speed of implementation, other present intervention strategies, and the status of the epidemic at the time and it should not be considered as a stand-alone immunisation strategy.
A. Fairweather, B. Swallow, R. Stuart et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.