GoAnt is introduced, a quality-diversity multi-agent search framework that combines non-communicating Explorer, Exploiter and Connector workers with a shared adaptive Mental Map and a compact Queen dispatcher, and a map-independent effective-yield protocol that counts high-quality, mutually nonredundant factors directly from each method's evaluation records, giving archive-based and map-free systems the same ruler.
Abstract
Automated alpha factor discovery searches symbolic trading signals from price-volume panels and order-book data under a fixed evaluation budget. Existing single- and multi-agent program-search systems can overfit predictive proxies that fail after execution costs and repeatedly explore redundant factor families, limiting execution robustness and behavioral diversity. We introduce GoAnt, a quality-diversity multi-agent search framework that combines non-communicating Explorer, Exploiter and Connector workers with a shared adaptive Mental Map and a compact Queen dispatcher. The Mental Map organizes candidates by leakage-free execution profiles and retains one elite per niche, while the Queen reallocates the evaluation budget from explicit search-state summaries. We also define a map-independent effective-yield protocol that counts high-quality, mutually nonredundant factors directly from each method's evaluation records, giving archive-based and map-free systems the same ruler. On real A-share microstructure data spanning 2023--2026, GoAnt reaches quality-weighted yields of 41.8 and 47.6 in price-volume and order-book settings, improving the strongest baseline by 57% and 97% under matched budgets. Its locked populations retain 0.64 and 0.67 of in-sample quality out of sample, compared with 0.61 and 0.63 for a static map.
Experiments across four Chinese stock universes show that AlphaDiverse can combine competitive prediction with broader exploration, and let the research system generate complementary plan portfolios and vary research environments across loops to collect diverse research paths.
Qing-Zhuo Wang, Zi-Kun Wei, Zhi-Hua Wei et al.· 1 citation
Multi-agent scientific discovery with large language models raises a coupled learning problem: research assignments determine both which experiments are pursued and the experiences from which agents adapt. We introduce MELD, a unified hierarchical test-time training framework that jointly adapts a team-level Coordinato...
Si-Zhe Tang, Zu-Yuan Zhang, Ze-Yu Fang et al.· 0 citations
Quantitative research is an iterative loop: a researcher proposes a market hypothesis, implements it as an executable signal, tests it on historical data, and decides what to keep. Existing benchmarks score formulas, code, or individual trading decisions, leaving open whether large language models (LLMs) can complete t...
Hou-De Qian, Zheng Jiang, Wen-Yi Li et al.· 0 citations
Findings show that rapidly changing, unstructured information can provide a valuable forecasting signal alongside structured statistics, whereas adding critic and meta-agent stages does not necessarily create complementary information or improve on the strongest specialist.
Julian Varghese, Lucas Bickmann, Sarah Sandmann· 0 citations
Large language model (LLM)-based AI Scientists advance scientific discovery, yet they suffer from inefficiencies due to noisy observations. Existing principle-evolving agents act on every anomaly, leaving its source unresolved: a new mechanism or an evaluation artifact, so invalid revisions bias evolution. To address t...
Pei-Ze Li, Ying-Ming Pu, Xing-Guo Xu et al.· 0 citations
These results support accounting for selection history when constructing and evaluating search-agent rollouts and rank first on seven QA benchmarks using Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-8B, and Qwen2.5-7B.
Zeng-Huang Fu, Ning Chen, Ming-Da Jia et al.· 1 citation