This report analyzes Qiushi Engine v0.8 across all 40 test tasks in AstaBench E2E-Bench-Hard, a benchmark that requires autonomous agents to carry a research question through experimental design, code implementation, actual execution, result analysis, and report delivery. Qiushi Engine is model-configurable; this evaluation selected DeepSeek deepseek-v4pro-preview as the model backend. The official AstaBench leaderboard records a score of 0.816 and an average benchmark cost of USD 15.209 per task, while the full-precision local recomputation is $81.59 \pm 1.87$. Four tasks satisfied every rubric item, yielding a full-task completion rate of 4/40 = 10% -- 7 percentage points above, and about 3.3 times, the approximately 3% best rate reported for AstaBench's official agents. Across 507 required rubric items, 416 were satisfied (82.1%). Official scoring archives and 40 Meta-Trace records show sustained production and verification of reports, code, and experimental artifacts; the principal gaps lie in repeated runs, external dependencies, specified metrics, and ablation studies. The report explains the benchmark, system workflow, aggregate results, representative cases, and limits of interpretation.
This work introduces MetroLLM-Bench, a 955-case benchmark for testing language models as the policy layer of a transit kiosk, and evaluates twenty-six models from six vendors, of which twenty-three are ranked.
ProgramDistill is introduced, a benchmark evaluating coding agents on features discovered through interaction with fully functional reference applications, and provides a scalable benchmark with controlled difficulty for evaluating and diagnosing coding agents, and a natural basis for future curriculum-based training.
Jeonghye Kim, Minseon Kim, Young Jin Kim et al.· 0 citations
This work systematize and audit exploits across five open large language models on SWE-bench Multilingual and DeepSWE using a turn-level LLM-as-a-judge protocol, demonstrating the critical need for exploit-aware evaluation frameworks that measure true repository-level problem solving over benchmark gaming.
Nikolai Ludwig, Wasi Uddin Ahmad, Somshubra Majumdar et al.· 0 citations
K-Bench is introduced, a benchmark that scores LLM unlearning under agentic deployment and certifies forgetting by reading the model's final answer, where a model that refuses to answer already counts as having forgotten.
Guang-Sheng Yu, Yan-Na Jiang, Qin Wang et al.· 0 citations
Jev answers MMLU's calculation-heavy questions more accurately than other MMLU questions (94% vs. 91%), whereas both open models, and all three on C-Eval, find them harder.
Tobias Deußer, L. Sparrenberg, R. Sifa· 9 citations· ⚡1