Skip to content

When Intelligence Becomes Agency: A Theory of Governed, Proactive Agency for Symbiotic AI Systems

Sep 2026 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

A conceptual and formal framework for governed proactive agency is developed, organizing behavior across time through perception, intent, affective-conative appraisal, constraint, and feedback, and is intended to guide the development and evaluation of always-present personal assistants and embodied support systems that augment human capabilities while preserving the principal's authority and judgment.

Abstract

Persistent AI assistants are intended to extend human attention, memory, and coordination across changing digital and physical environments. To be truly useful they must do more than just act when asked. They must decide on their own whether a situation warrants behavior at all, when it does and in what mode, whether to act, ask, monitor, defer or deliberately refrain. We call this the activation problem. Research on commitment, appraisal, mixed-initiative interaction and delegation each illuminates part of it, but none ties situated activation to continuing authorization and accountability. This paper develops a conceptual and formal framework for governed proactive agency, organizing behavior across time through perception, intent, affective-conative appraisal, constraint, and feedback. It distinguishes autonomous and delegated agency and defines symbiotic agency as delegation under a standing, revocable mandate, with continuing coupling to the principal's situation, calibrated inference of their condition, and bounded personalization. The distinctive contribution is an integrated account linking activation decisions to authorized perception, behavior selection, authority containment, traceable restraint, and constrained adaptation, with behavioral episodes as the unit of analysis. Through an agency classification method, an evaluation framework, proposed benchmark scenarios, and a reference architecture, the account provides a basis for specifying and assessing whether assistance is warranted, timely, authorized, and answerable beyond task completion alone. It is intended to guide the development and evaluation of always-present personal assistants and embodied support systems that augment human capabilities while preserving the principal's authority and judgment.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Open access Oct 2026

Towards Characterising Conditions of Assistance, Hindrance and Depletion in Human Agency from AI Systems

Policy and academic discourse around AI often invokes concerns about AI systems' effects on "human autonomy". A growing literature also highlights the priority for augmentation, extension, or amplification of human agency. However, as prior authors have pointed out, the concept of 'autonomy' is vague and heterogeneous;...

Tushit Jha, Rory Svarc, Tom Everitt · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Do you know what your AI agent can do on its own?

A two-dimensional design space is introduced in which both dimensions are organised into five operational levels, making the coupling explicit and navigable, and six architectural tactics for adjusting a deployment’s position within it are proposed, offering a shared vocabulary for compliance-aware agentic AI design.

D. Safin, Dian Baltaa, Timon Sengewaldb et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Oct 2026

Personalizing AI to Align with the Better You

AI alignment is standardly framed as making AI systems track what humans want. But what users want, under everyday conditions, is frequently at odds with what users themselves would reflectively endorse. Across AI and the broader attention economy, the former is systematically elicited and optimized for while the latte...

Jakob Stenseke, Jocelyn Zhu, Dylan Hadfield-Menell · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Instrumental succession: the gradual transfer of agency to AI

The instrumental succession thesis is introduced: that human controllers of powerful AI systems pursue a set of instrumental dispositions that progressively increase the AI’s capabilities and lead to the AI exercising an increasing share of oversight and control over key decisions and processes, resulting in the gradua...

Preston W. Estep · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Anticipatory Human Oversight of Agentic AI: A Philosophical Account

Human oversight is widely held to mitigate the risks of AI systems. Even for systems that produce discrete outputs at identifiable decision points, the realisation of human oversight as a reactive measure is empirically fragile, yet increasingly well understood. However, for agentic AI -- systems that plan, decompose g...

Kevin Baum, Maximilian Kiener, Markus Langer et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.