DI-Bench is presented, a pipeline for generating realistic benchmarks for data intelligence (DI), the practice of extracting insights from large volumes of enterprise data, and four models are evaluated, revealing a substantial finding: models achieve only 32% accuracy when doing computational tasks where retrieved business rules modify the computation.
Abstract
Evaluating enterprise agents on domain-specific benchmarks is critical, yet public benchmarks rarely evaluate whether agents can integrate business knowledge with analytical computation, and constructing such benchmarks manually is costly. We present DI-Bench, a pipeline for generating realistic benchmarks for data intelligence (DI), the practice of extracting insights from large volumes of enterprise data. To emulate realistic DI tasks that require both computation and knowledge retrieval, DI-Bench builds an artifact linkage graph over data tables, dimensions, metrics, and documents to form questions involving structured data and associated knowledge. Ground truth answers are derived via query execution, followed by LLM question generation and validation. Applied to two public datasets, the pipeline produces a 731-task benchmark covering knowledge retrieval, analytical computation, and rule-grounded reasoning. To show the discriminatory capability and difficulty of the benchmark, we evaluate four models, revealing a substantial finding: models achieve only 32% accuracy when doing computational tasks where retrieved business rules modify the computation.
Real-world enterprise data science and analytics workflows require reasoning across dozens of tables, performing statistical analyses, and acting on the results. Established text-to-SQL benchmarks evaluate query generation alone, and audits have found their answer keys frequently wrong. Because real enterprise warehous...
Gabriel Tomitsuka, Arman Raayatsanati, Emily Xing et al.· 1 citation
CorporateBench (CB), a human-validated multi-task Q&A benchmark whose scale approaches the conditions LLMs encounter in corporate communication networks, is presented, with evaluation corpora surpassing 230,000 documents.
Sil Hamilton, A. Sun, Óscar Romero et al.· 1 citation
FinFIRST is the first financial benchmark to jointly evaluate answers and supporting evidence through atomic rubrics, retaining final-answer correctness as the primary objective while making the supporting research process measurable, verifiable, and diagnosable.
Wen-Qing Wang, Hai-Tao Xiang, Xin-Yi Zhao et al.· 1 citation
This work introduces an automated pipeline for generating synthetic datasets of emails reflecting realistic workplace scenarios, along with long- and short-form questions and gold answers grounded in the data, and underscores the importance of realistic, high-complexity evaluation data for developing stronger real-worl...
Amey Varhade, Ananya Sutradhar, Ravishankar Krishnaswamy et al.· 0 citations
Trace analysis shows failures concentrate at language-mediated reasoning - entity disambiguation, cross-source grounding, rather than tool invocation mechanics, rather than tool invocation mechanics.
Ankita Rajaram Naik, Anupama Murthi, Benjamin Elder et al.· 0 citations
BizSage is presented, a multi-agent framework combining corpus-level fine-grained retrieval with quality-driven self-evolution that paves the way for reliable research assistance in economics, business, and the broader social sciences.
Yu-He Wu, Guang-Yu Wang, Jia-Xin Liu et al.· 0 citations