A novel perturbation test based on a nonsmooth max-difference revenue statistic comparing the best null assortment with the best alternative assortment and asymptotic validity of the proposed p-value under adaptive assortment selection is proposed.
Abstract
We study post-learning inference for structural properties of data-dependent combinatorial optimizers. The target is whether an oracle optimizer, rather than a latent parameter or smooth functional, belongs to a prescribed class, such as a category-mix, inventory, or resource-feasibility class. We focus on a high-dimensional contextual multinomial logit model with sequentially adaptive data collection, where the parameter-to-optimizer map is discontinuous and the policy induces temporal dependence. We propose a novel perturbation test based on a nonsmooth max-difference revenue statistic comparing the best null assortment with the best alternative assortment. The test perturbs the estimated terminal revenue surface on the selected support: random unit directions capture directional uncertainty, while the minimal perturbation radius captures magnitude uncertainty and yields a p-value. This localizes inference near the null--alternative boundary and avoids uniform error control over the full candidate class. The data are collected by an \(\ell_1\)-penalized online likelihood policy that performs variable selection while controlling regret. Using a new anti-concentration argument for Gaussian maxima differences and martingale Gaussian coupling, we establish uniform estimation rates, effective support recovery, and asymptotic validity of the proposed p-value under adaptive assortment selection. We prove asymptotic size control and power consistency under a localized signal condition.
A distributionally robust framework based on optimal transport (OT) for harnessing such heterogeneous data in conditional optimization and demonstrating the value of the framework through a conditional assortment problem using demand and product-feature data from multiple stores is demonstrated.
A more flexible framework in which a predictive model determines the nominal distribution and a separate model estimates a data-dependent radius is developed, which treats calibration as a practical mechanism for reliable decision making rather than a universal guarantee of improved optimization performance.
We propose a noise-robust elicit-to-optimize framework that integrates inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) and reinforcement learning (RL) for eliciting agents'risk preferences and optimizing policies under a broad class of risk objectives characterized by distortion riskmetrics. On the elicitation side, we propose an...
Yang Liu, Yu-Hao Liu, Yun-Ran Wei· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Outcomes are regressed on a calibrated probability vector for unobserved class membership. Under a structural conditional mean excluding the score and conditional calibration, the observed-data model reduces to a partially linear regression. The probability vector is a Berkson-type surrogate for membership, so the effe...
The end-to-end treatment policy delivered a statistically significant $+7.20\% lift in the primary long-term-value metric, demonstrating the feasibility of production-scale causal optimization under business constraints.
Changshuai Wei, John Bencina, Phuc Nguyen et al.· 0 citations
This work derives a finite-dimensional dual formulation of PrO inference that separates sampling fluctuation, approximation under a divergence budget, regularization, and numerical optimization error and uses an exactly solvable categorical example to show that predictive-risk convergence can imply convergence to a uni...
Aurya Javeed, D. Kouri, Teresa Portone et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.