Skip to content
Review

Making Time-Sensitive Networking Deployable: A Comprehensive Lifecycle Architecture

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 74 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work presents a comprehensive overview of the TSN deployment lifecycle, current challenges, limitations of existing tools, and future research directions for TSN deployment and management, and identifies key research gaps from a deployment perspective and provides guidance for the development of next-generation deployable TSN networks.

Abstract

Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) provides deterministic guarantees and bounded latency for safety-critical applications across different domains. While the IEEE 802.1 TSN standards provide a comprehensive set of mechanisms for time synchronization, shaping, scheduling, resource reservation, and reliability, deploying TSN in real-world applications remains a complex, multi-step engineering task. Existing research primarily focuses on optimizing individual objectives, such as increasing schedulability, reducing latency, accelerating solution generation, or improving performance analysis. However, whether these extensively researched solutions can be deployed in real-world systems remains unanswered, as the assumptions made in these methodologies often differ from practical hardware constraints. Therefore, a broader, holistic view of end-to-end TSN deployment and management remains an open research question. Currently, there is a lack of a unified perspective, consensus, and coordinated research efforts focusing on a comprehensive end-to-end TSN deployment workflow. We present a comprehensive overview of the TSN deployment lifecycle, current challenges, limitations of existing tools, and future research directions for TSN deployment and management. Lastly, we identify key research gaps from a deployment perspective and provide guidance for the development of next-generation deployable TSN networks.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Hierarchical Scheduler with Adaptive Time-Budget Reallocation for Time-Triggered Edge-Fog-Cloud Architectures

The lack of determinism restricts the integration of safety-critical applications into Edge–Fog–Cloud (EFC) architectures. Existing EFC schedulers are typically designed for dynamic, best-effort operation based on unmanaged resource allocation and elastic virtualization. This paradigm introduces unbounded queueing, res...

Omar Hekal, Josepaul Paulachan, Daniel Onwuchekwa et al. · 0 citations
2026

Efficient Management of Composite Heterogeneous Applications at the Network Edge

Edge computing is a promising paradigm for deploying latency-sensitive applications (Apps) as it brings resources closer to end users. Edge Apps often adopt a microservice (MS) architecture, breaking monolithic Apps into lightweight, containerized MSs that can be dynamically and independently deployed. However, managin...

Madhura Adeppady, Yenchia Yu, Ali Rahmanian et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

SbDN: Source-based TSN-Grade Deterministic Networking using Commodity Switches

SbDN is presented, a Multi-Agent Source-based architecture that achieves TSN-grade determinism using commodity Ethernet switches and provides two methods: Temporal Network Partitioning (TNP), which provides strict temporal isolation on pure FIFO switches, and Traffic Prioritization (TP), which leverages strict-priority...

Mohammadparsa Karimi, Majid Nabi, Andrew Nelson et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Scheduling Real-Time Serverless Smart Grid Workflows with Chain-Aware DRL

Serverless computing has emerged as a promising paradigm for deploying distributed cyber-physical systems (CPS), such as smart grids and industrial control applications, due to its elasticity and lightweight execution model. In these CPS settings, sensing, communication, and actuation are tightly coupled in closed-loop...

Vajiheh Farhadi · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Scaling 5G-TSN Bridges: Operating Regimes, Scheduling, and Time Synchronisation Under Heterogeneous Industrial Traffic

The nascTime framework on OMNeT++/Simu5G is used to evaluate how many TSN endpoints a single 5G NR cell can bridge before per-flow QoS degrades, showing that sub-3 ms TSN deadlines may require radio-configuration changes such as configured grants or higher numerology.

Mohamed A. M. Seliem, U. Roedig, C. Sreenan et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

B-CUBE: a burst-aware 5G-TSN architecture and its large-scale mixed-flow scheduling

B-CUBE is proposed, a novel burst-aware 5G-TSN architecture that equips each industrial node with co-deployed TSN and 5G system bridges to enable wired, wireless, and dual-mode transmission, and designs a set of e-cient cross-domain mixed-flow scheduling algorithms.

Yi Xue, Jie Jia, Hao-Yang Mao et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.