This review evaluating how the antagonistic interplay between Polycomb and Trithorax complexes, chromatin modifier activity, and enhancer reprogramming affects lineage identity and enables multi-lineage plasticity in cancer underscores epigenetic deregulation as a primary driver of lineage plasticity and intratumoral heterogeneity.
Abstract
Lineage plasticity develops as tumor cells overcome terminal differentiation barriers, adapt to environmental stressors, and acquire metastatic, therapy-resistant phenotypes. These phenotypic transitions are driven by nonmutational epigenetic mechanisms, including dynamic shifts in chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, DNA methylation, and noncoding RNA activity beyond genetic alterations. While epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity (EMP) remains a foundational model, cancer-cell plasticity extends into a broader pan-plasticity spectrum encompassing dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation into neuroendocrine or squamous lineages, and stem cell-like reprogramming. In this review, we evaluate how the antagonistic interplay between Polycomb and Trithorax complexes, chromatin modifier activity, and enhancer reprogramming affects lineage identity and enables multi-lineage plasticity in cancer. We further discuss extrinsic mechanisms reinforced by the tumor microenvironment, particularly hypoxia, chronic inflammation, and metabolic stress, that rewire the epigenetic landscape to stabilize plastic states. Collectively, these data underscore epigenetic deregulation as a primary driver of lineage plasticity and intratumoral heterogeneity, while revealing therapeutic vulnerabilities and the potential to reverse plasticity and overcome therapy resistance by targeting the epigenome.
How emerging single-cell and spatial multi-omics technologies, integrated with artificial intelligence-based modeling, enable mapping of cell state landscapes and transitional trajectories, transforming lineage plasticity from a descriptive phenomenon into a measurable and predictable property of tumor evolution is dis...
Melanie Fraidenburg, Long-Jun Li, R. Kwon et al.· Cancer Letters· 0 citations
Current insights into the epigenetic regulation of cancer metastasis are summarized, emerging epigenetic therapies are evaluated, and translational opportunities to advance precision anti-metastatic strategies and improve patient outcomes are highlighted.
P. Pandey, D. Tripathi, Kartik Mittal et al.· Onco· 0 citations
Tumor plasticity and microenvironmental heterogeneity are established as an integrated, evolving system that fuels metastasis and limits durable treatment responses.
G. Dagar, M. Dagar, Ashna Gupta et al.· MedComm· 0 citations
The conceptual boundaries and operational criteria for identifying OnF in CRC are discussed, its regulatory mechanisms, plasticity-associated phenotypes, and translational relevance are examined, and the importance of distinguishing direct evidence of OnF from evidence of related plasticity mechanisms is emphasized.
Hao-Yu Wang, Song-Hao Liu, Ming-Xuan Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
A particular focus on the bidirectional interplay between CSCs and the tumor immune microenvironment is focused on, which may provide a conceptual framework for the development of more rational combination strategies, although their clinical benefit remains to be validated.
Jingyu Tan, Tao Wen, Jian Liu et al.· Journal of Hematology & Onco...· 0 citations
How key metabolic pathways, including glycolysis, fatty acid oxidation, and amino acid metabolism govern innate immune cell fate through epigenetic mechanisms is discussed, including long-lasting imprints associated with innate immune memory.
J. Noh, Jaehyun Lee, Chaelin You et al.· Experimental and Molecular M...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.